chvgchvg

It is truly an incredible ability. I am trying to battle the idea of elegance over substance. The idea that elegance comes first. Many authors trying to sound more elegant (every high school english class is guilty of this) instead of putting in more substance.

I agree with the statement that there is no singular truth. Everything, especially in politics, is a bunch of shit on both sides, where it’s often hard to understand what is better. Usually, the truth almost always lies somewhere in the middle.

But many writers use hyperbole, exaggeration, and other literary techniques that push ideas to the extreme of one side; is that not pushing back on the idea that there is no singular truth?

Style is definitely not pointless, but I also would disagree with you that a painting carries only style and elegance and holds no meaning. I am often moved by a song by what it is trying to convey to me or the story it is describing. Again, without style, I would never listen to the song.

I do believe, though, that writers often put elegance instead of meaning into their writing for the sole purpose of getting popular. And this hurts our literature.

Yes I agree elegance is not directly bullshit. But putting elegance to hide the bullshit, is bullshit. Many authors often don't even realize that they are saying nothing and are only writing flowery sentences that don't mean much.

I feel like the poetry of the 21st century is a great victim of this. Poetry now sucks... Too little that convey with too many words.

I feel pretentious to continually quote 1984, but those slogans seem eerily close to the way that the Party instilled propaganda through slogans.

Every form of language is super effective. But I believe if 100 people around you say the same idea, and only 5 oppose it, you will believe the 100 people. Since digital media is so easy to upscale to thousands, and even millions of users, I believe digital language has the biggest capability of making a change (good or bad (often bad imo)).

I thought about it and I agree. Almost all quotes I hear are full of flowery language and elegant writing. Regardless if they say unique ideas or not.

Straight up 1984 newspeak. Words hold two opposing meanings at once, and because of that, do they really mean anything?

Yeah, its truly saddening to see the declining literacy rates. I feel like lots of social media, today, is creating a stupidification effect on people.

Yes I agree, different words do hold different meanings, and less common words hold less specific meanings, and I love reading well crafted, elegant writing. I agree with your point. I guess I'm pouring out my hate on "fake crafted elegance". Like the one you mentioned: "using a thesaurus and agonizing over sentence structure" ONLY for the purpose of making it "sound" better. Not to make it sound truer to you, but to make it sound better to the ears.

Sorry I tried adding a click link onto the text but I failed miserably lol. I am new to substack I apologize! I find Orwell's English essay one of my favorites.