Mathematics is an internally consistent (for the most part) logical framework that is extremely powerful in expressing our knowledge about the world.
However, that doesn't mean that there is some intrinsic correctness about it or its concepts.
1,372 karma · joined May 23, 2011
I'm on the lookout for some hard, and interesting things to work on.
Mathematics is an internally consistent (for the most part) logical framework that is extremely powerful in expressing our knowledge about the world.
However, that doesn't mean that there is some intrinsic correctness about it or its concepts.
And the actual paper (the full paper is behind a paywall): http://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(13)01521-3
To answer your second question I believe pg has stated that only users with over 10000 karma have their comments automatically endorsed.
I've recently finished Dan Gilbert's: Stumbling on Happiness and I highly recommend it. It's witty and gives you a very different way of looking at what you think makes you happy.
I know these aren't start-up books, but unfortunately I haven't read any to recommend.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7449857
So, this isn't going to be a drastic change, rather it'll be more like a tool for the moderator to improve the quality of conversations that are becoming nasty.
Does this mean that they are not enabled by default?
Thank you very much for the product!
EDIT: Somehow, I'd completely missed all discussion on tarsnap.
As far as I can see from the article (couldn't find the paper detailing the experiment), they observed an artifact that could have been caused by primordial gravitational waves. This is different from using a thermometer to measure temperature because we're not sure yet whether that is the only possibility (or our instruments are not sensitive/too sensitive, it's a different mechanism of inflation etc.), it's the best explanation, but we're not extremely sure yet. (Although as I say this it occurred to me that it's probably much more certain than before because of the discovery.)
The key takeaway here is that the inflationary model is almost certainly the right one and gravitational waves are almost certainly real.
(This is similar to the first Higgs Boson announcement, where we were almost certain it was the Higgs, but not sure enough to claim discovery; because we hadn't determined all the properties of the observed particle)
What genre is your book in, and what kinds of work do you produce? Do you think you could possibly answer a few of my questions over email? Thank you!
Being a physics major myself, my advice is probably reasonable. In applying to internships make sure your skills are clearly displayed, applying for jobs with professors is probably the best thing for a freshman or sophmore.
If you haven't done any major programming, I'd suggest contributing to open source projects or building something that takes concerted, consistent effort, to show companies that they can actually use you.
Work of choice will be really hard to come by, unless you're really lucky; happy hunting!
How is this not a warranted situation for deportation, and why should he not be deported?
Since the OP lives in Spain and is a Spanish resident, it's a rather reasonable guess that she's managed to to mitigate her circumstance to one that's manageable (by putting distance between her family and herself), so kudos to her, and yet she still struggles with a rejection of the invite which is quite sad.
Disclaimer: I'm a (semi?) immigrant who's lived in India for most of his life (before coming to Canada, which was heavily dissuaded by a lot of my maternal family) so I have a sense of what it's like to reject the cultural oppression that the OP seems to face.
(In the link attempting explain the flatness problem), one cannot just assume all galaxies are moving towards each other without first positioning a center (of those galaxies). That in itself invalidates the rest of the flatness argument, which is required for the article on your link.
This was based on a precursory read, so it may not be entirely right
Combined with the people who are here, waterloo is dripping with a sense of vigour that if you go looking for it will send you to great heights.
Think about it this way: Your buddies are starting companies, earning many thousands of dollars and changing the world in important areas; are you simply going to sit around and graduate? I think not.
It's hard to know whether a developer is good or bad with only a resume/interview. If you're looking for smart motivated people, the ones who tend to work on side projects etc. can actually show you stuff they've built, and generally you can get a good idea as to how/if they'd fit in with your company/start-up.
While this doesn't mean developers who don't take on side projects are bad, it's just hard to identify whether they are in fact good or bad.
I do not know of any societies with strong patriarchal norms and very little misogyny, if they do indeed exist.
I for one don't expect anyone to be okay with misogyny, whether it be cultural or not, and I presume all the other Indians here feel the same way.
The only reason that you advocate learning hindi over English is the ease of picking up the language, which I believe is just plain wrong. The English language is structurally much more free, and easy to pick up than a language such as hindi.
That being said, your premise of standardizing one language seems to be resting on the rather flimsy idea that if the majority of people spoke one language, they would speak it well.
A language is (usually) only spoken well when introduced at a very young age, and that seems to be the only determining factor as to whether one particular language should become an Indian standard. (If anything that language should be Sanskrit since it's the most structurally sound language among almost all the Indian languages)
However, I really didn't understand much, until my father explained it to me in very simplified terms. The concepts are pretty simple, the details are not.