7,172 karma · joined November 11, 2011
============================ Chris Acky / Feel free to contact me for any reason. Always happy to help or elaborate in greater detail on anything I have written here.
I hate that the switch does this.
But it means sense if everyone in Japan is used to that behaviour because of the swapping of X and O on Playstation.
Only reason I read the article was that I was confused how someone with CFO skillset would become both the President and Chief Information Office.
Based on the EDPB Decision [1], it seems the most weight of the decision is from paragprah 107:
> As explained by the EDPB in its Recommendations 01/2020 on measures that supplement transfer tools to ensure compliance with the EU level of protection of personal data (hereinafter ‘EDPB Recommendations on Supplementary Measures’) 243, when assessing third countries and identifying appropriate supplementary measures, controllers should assess if there is anything in the law and/or practices in force of the third country that may impinge on the effectiveness of the appropriate safeguards of the transfer tools that they are relying on 244. In this regard, the EDPB notes that, according to Meta IE’s assessment, ‘the level of protection required by EU law is provided for by relevant US law and practice’ and that Meta IE implemented supplementary measures in addition to the 2021 SCCS in order to ‘further ensure that an adequate level of protection continues to apply to User Data transferred from FIL to FB, Inc’ 245 . In other words, Meta IE has implemented supplementary measures on the basis of an assessment which concluded that there was no need for such measures, since, in Meta IE’s view, the relevant US law and practice were already providing a level of protection equivalent to the one provided under EU law
My follow on question, let's say they understood the risk, I fail to see any safeguards which could be equivalent to the EU law? FISA 702 + other intrusive surveillance laws basically make this impossible.
So it seems that because Meta:
> seems to identify its own test for determining suitability of supplemental measures by lowering the standard to include measures that can “address” or “mitigate” any “relevant remaining” inadequacies in the protections offered by US law and practice and the SCCs’ 249, and concludes in the Draft Decision that ‘Meta Ireland does not have in place any supplemental measures which would compensate for the inadequate protection provided by US law’
I'm just confused what would have been sufficient for Meta in this circumstance?
The decision continues in paragraph 121 to say:
> In this regard, the EDPB recalls that the IE SA carries out a detailed assessment of whether Meta IE implemented supplementary measures that could address the inadequate protection provided by US law 273. More specifically, the IE SA analyses the organisational, technical and legal measures implemented by Meta IE and concludes that these measures cannot, ‘whether viewed in isolation, or in tandem with the 2021 SCCs and the full suite of measures outlined in the ROS’, compensate for the deficiencies identified in US law and cannot provide essentially equivalent protection to that available under EU law 2
I am aware of zero technical and organsiational measures which could protect against 702 FISA DOWNSTREAM (PRISM), short of not transfering the data to US?
Thoughts?
[1]: https://edpb.europa.eu/system/files/2023-05/edpb_bindingdeci...
If Meta are relying on SCCs to safeguard against the transfer of cross-border data processes from EU to US, the same clauses which was recommended by the CJEU from the Schrems II case, what is the legal challenge?
Does anyone have any links to the actual decision so I can read the technical points of the judgment?
Is it reasonable for a company to make a change that effects 0.5-1% of their workforce? I think yes. How about 2%? At what point do the lines get blurred in your judgment?
I gave it the requirements and just copied and pasted.
Red = External (Very Likely, I need preparation + Notes). Blue = Internal Green = 121 Session etc. Black = Self-Blocked to Stop People trying to Add me to Calls
Basically, I have 40+ events a week. If I have to go through each one and self-organise when I already organise in my Gmail calendar via Color Coding, it would be huge barrier for me.
I ended up loving the interface, but the extra work I was creating for myself to "filter" and prioritise which activities needed Tasks was a deal breaker for me.
You seriously don't want to see my calendar each week. (Or maybe you do for understanding this pain point).. but having a personal planning tool understand the colors of my calendar events would be an immediate killer for me.
I've tested abotu 15 different tools, and in the end found that there wans't any personal tools available. The closest I found was Sunsama. I currently use "Sortd" though for the email integration.
About a week later I was doing my household budget and looked at the charge on my account, and it excluded the discount. Once you added in delivery, service charge and the tip, I ended up paying 30%+ more for the food (and didn't have my coupon).
I think this was a genuine dark pattern that they use, although I have no interest in putting it to the test. After a failed payment, they auto remove any applied coupons to your transaction....
This was my first and guess-what, last order.
The idea was that you would sail north cast spells until you level up, then stop, and move the boat 13 tiles, then repeat the spell. It genuinely worked for leveling up high eval.
I posted this entirely to shine a spotlight on the quality control systems which are in place which allows this abuse to occur in the first place.
Honestly, if I had to guess how this occurred, I would suspect someone within Amazon with administrator rights merged an ASIN with another ASIN to create this page. Maybe someone with more understanding of the innards of AMZ can explain how this happens...
To save people a click through to Reddit and through to Amz: https://imgur.com/a/FG3hZW0
I'm actually TERRIFIED of pluggin anything in to my kids Switch other than Nintendo's official cable, incase I brick i t.
Does anyone know if they've patched this? I have some Dell laptop charger USB-Cs which I use alot, and I've had to caution everything in the family to never plug the Switch into it despite it fitting and despite every room in the house having such a charger...
I really like how transparent you've made: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sGKmbnW74u9r1GOzAQcI...
And I wanted to run something similar but for our own network of sites. (If so you can reach me on my email in profile). Have about 400 sites to access.
Reason I ask is I'm trying to get all subdomain a of a certain domain. So I want a reverse host of unique hostnames under a certain domain.
> They should be random, but roughly-ordered over time so that your MySQL/Postgres indices stay fast and efficient as the dataset grows.
I'm currently facing an issue where the chosen uuid format was v4. From my understanding this is the least preferable because it's true random, which causes hell for mysql indices.
What I don't quite udnerstand however, is why is sorted random better if I'm using an index in both cases? I'd like to know what I should be doing and if there is a way to move/migrate if possible
Anyway, the Matrix counterpoint (as explained by the Agent to Morpheus) was that the original Matrix was a perfect world. No famine, no poverty, everything was perfect, but the captive humans minds couldn't cope with such perfection, there had to be disorder for the environment to self-regulate and the original Matrix collapsed.