How do Americans think about bone marrow as a dish?
5,951 karma · joined August 6, 2011
How do Americans think about bone marrow as a dish?
(Sharing is useful if you set up new accounts for other users.)
Charging will take in any case much longer than refueling.
Another issue is the survivability of incidents. If something goes wrong, for example with your pressure cabin or your oxygen supply, you have only seconds to start your mitigation measures.
I dislike Google reCAPTCHA, however, it brought down contact form and comment spam to almost zero. (With the price of an unknown number of false positives and some frustrated users.)
Switzerland is a close US ally. It is even a second-tier partner to the NSA as we know from the Snowden leaks:
https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2013/10/30/5270985d63fd3d7d778...
Geneva, the home of ProtonMail, is a major international spy hub thanks to the UN. Snowden was even working in Geneva for some time.
'The order may require real-time surveillance to be carried out and the handover of the retained secondary data of telecommunications from past communications (retroactive surveillance).'
https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/20122728/...
We are not talking about a public televised event. We are talking about a statement during a presentation. It happens all time time: People talk, sometimes they talk too much.
'The order may require real-time surveillance to be carried out and the handover of the retained secondary data of telecommunications from past communications (retroactive surveillance).'
https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/20122728/...
The question is not whether ProtonMail has access to user data. (They have, you are absolutely right.) They question is if they perform real-time surveillance, i.e., lawful surveillance (whether voluntarily or not).
'By default' is of course legalese. If a user can turn on the IP logging feature, you can too. And you did in at least one case according to your own transparency report:
'In April 2019, at the request of the Swiss judiciary in a case of clear criminal conduct, we enabled IP logging against a specific user account which is engaged in illegal activities which contravene Swiss law. Pursuant to Swiss law, the user in question will also be notified and afforded the opportunity to defend against this in court before the data can be used in criminal proceedings.'
The statement even matches your own transparency report where you describe a case of IP logging, a typical real-time surveillance measure:
'In April 2019, at the request of the Swiss judiciary in a case of clear criminal conduct, we enabled IP logging against a specific user account which is engaged in illegal activities which contravene Swiss law. Pursuant to Swiss law, the user in question will also be notified and afforded the opportunity to defend against this in court before the data can be used in criminal proceedings.'
https://protonmail.com/blog/transparency-report/
(You mention April 2019, the statement by the state prosecutor was made at the beginning of May, i.e., he was probably really happy about your cooperation.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Worldwide_Interban...
'Public prosecutor Walder of the Competence Center Cybercrime contacted me, saying he had been misquoted. He claims that had not divulged at the above-mentioned event that ProtonMail voluntarily releases real-time data. He had merely described ProtonMail as a potential provider of derived communication services (PDCS).
I was live-tweeting the event, including the interesting presentation by public prosecutor Walder. The remark that ProtonMail was a (potential) PDCS would have been too trivial to be live-tweeted. The insight on the other hand that ProtonMail voluntarily offers assistance for real-time surveillance, was spectacular and I therefore live-tweeted the statement. In its transparency report, ProtonMail – as mentioned above – itself refers to at least one case of real-time surveillance.'
https://steigerlegal.ch/2019/05/23/protonmail-real-time-surv...
Important: The English text is just an unofficial translation.
1. It results in tracking and could violate the GDPR and other data privacy laws.
2. It is third-party content and might get blocked by ad / content blockers.
I suggest to offer a default HTML source code without CC icons.
Same for websites. It makes sense for development, however, it remains turned on in most apps. And at least under iOS, there is no actual ad / tracking blocking available for, well, against apps.