894 karma · joined January 24, 2012
It's hard not to conclude that it's immoral to not chuck lithium in the water supply, if the natural variance is associated with a doubling of murder. The study has been replicated on suicide in Japan[2] and on Dementia in Denmark[3].
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1699579
https://www.buzzfeed.com/josephbernstein/heres-how-breitbart...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/29/opinion/east-germany-immi...
Every few years I try to write a column staking out a reasonable middle ground on immigration. After all, most big, important issues are clashes in which both sides have a piece of the truth.
The case for restricting immigration seems superficially plausible. Over the last several decades we’ve conducted a potentially reckless experiment. The number of foreign-born Americans is at record highs, straining national cohesion, raising distrust. Maybe America should take a pause, as we did in the 1920s. After all, that pause seemed to produce the cohesive America of the 1940s that won the war and rose to pre-eminence.
Every few years I try to write this moderate column. And every few years I fail. That’s because when you wade into the evidence you find that the case for restricting immigration is pathetically weak. The only people who have less actual data on their side are the people who deny climate change.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open%E2%80%93closed_political_...
This is correct. Warm winters is also a significant pull-factor.
Back when Wikileaks had a better reputation, it also helped affray Correa's attacks on free speech at home. Now that Assange's reputation is in the gutter, he's only a liability to Ecuador.
This is practically a conspiracy theory. There are definitely old teachers that frown on the value of technology, but this is because they're old, not because they're teachers and somehow have a financial incentive to believe otherwise.
When the topic is rape, you always go into these comments expecting some kind of reflexive criticism or minimisation but this is honestly one of the most bizarre manifestations of that yet.
Haha. Try working in education or, gasp, environmental science, if you think that the contestability of simple facts is shocking.
Even if it's largely financially motivated, it's still nice to see some kind of assessment of what kind of content they are willing to enable.
https://media.ycharts.com/charts/2dd4f9a7b087a1eb6f763d81a97...