49 karma · joined October 13, 2010
Picking individual stokcs requires a lot of time , energy and knowledge.
Since I need to put my focus on the things that is working and brings income, I do not want to distract myself.
If this method can be broken down into steps, it would be 1. Decide your Asset allocation. eg : US stocks 20% US bonds 20% Developed market 20% Emerging Market 10% REITS 20% 2. Pick low MER ETFs for each category. 3. Check & Rebalance your portfolio regularly. 4. No matter what happens stick to your asset allocation.
There are many books explaining this. "THe blogleheads' guide to investing" would be good start.
You cannot become like a next Warren Buffett with this strategy. But you can focus on the things you are good at, while your money is growing.
With Servint and Mediatemple DV for the past couple of years and didn't have any major issues to complain.
According to this research http://searchengineland.com/organic-click-thru-rates-tumblin...
http://startupboy.com/2005/12/20/fix-the-search-interface-fi...
Some suggestions : 1. Move 300X250 on the sidebar above your Facebook box. 2. Move 300X250 in the content area up, close to your content.
I couldn't sell it. For me it looks like buyers assume that reported income and traffic of any listed site is higher than the actual figures. So they expect a ridiculously lower price for sites.
There are so many listings that wants to sell for 2 - 3 times monthly earnings. Why would anyone want to do that? Can't they just keep the site themselves for another 3 months and earn that money.
If it is organic traffic from Google, we too noticed a change in Google traffic around that date to our various sites. It may be a recent change in Google algorithm worked in favour of your pages.
My experimental sites(the contents that I made sure they are crappy in the eyes of humans) with cheap content ($3/100 words) without any editorial control marked as quality sites and perform well in searches. While the sites that we spent thousands of dollars with strict editorial control were punished for some reason.
At one point a scrapper site that picks up one of our sites partial feed with 150 words excerpt out ranked us in the search results. What kind of quality guideline is that, a 750 words post is bad quality while a 150 words excerpt of that is good.
Google's motive may be good, observing it for the past 7 months, I found their approach is wrong.
As you do I use BIng/DuckDuckGO these days. Google has so much market share (around 85% in my observation ), if it goes down to 30% then we don't need to worry about pleasing Google, but focus on pleasing our customers/visitors like normal business do.
A mechanism is needed to weed out the listings that reports earnings/traffic which is practically impossible compared to their site age, design, content, functionality, rankings(comcast,alexa,compete)
In my opinion Yahoo and Bing are the only ones in a position to develop a real alternative to Adsense.
Nobody can't argue it can't happen, why take a risk of having our entire search history in one place.
Still have few more months in the second year,already passed the 50K+ mark.
Both have original content. I never even thought about gaming the system. I couldn't figure out what triggered this.
One of the site has the perfect landing page that user is looking for the queries. I don't understand how this change could improve the quality.
Blue ocean strategy
Atleast meeting your day to day expenses won't be a factor in decision making while you work on your main project.