400 karma · joined June 18, 2011
> That said, I understand why they are doing it. It doesn't make sense whatsoever to receive one time payment and provide updates forever.
This. While justified, so many apps messed up the switch to subscriptions.
We recently switched our app Genius Scan to a subscription model, but tried to do it The Right Way: users who had purchased the pro features automatically got subscribed to our Plus plan for life.
New users will have to subscribe though, as it's the only way to be sustainable.
We also introduced a new plan, Ultra, with more advanced features. This way, we still get a chance for long time users to support us if they upgrade to the Ultra plan.
We didn’t ask for it. Corporations made it desirable.
Hydro isn't the panacea. It's destroying ecosystems. Climate change is a problem but the biodiversity collapse another one.
https://eu.patagonia.com/fr/en/stories/telling-the-dam-truth...
There are alternatives to Google Inbox (Spark, Superhuman - that I just discover) but I don't want to add a third-party that can read my emails.
Given that Inbox is sunsetting and the trust issues I have with Google in general, it's the first time since I created my Gmail account that I'm considering moving to something different.
If Fastmail or Protonmail had the Inbox features such as Snooze and grouping of emails with the quick "Archive", I wouldn't hesitate a second.
Eye break is a great idea.
Instagram has their trademark since September 2011 (http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4808:v4h...).
So no, Instapaper is not "lucky" to still be in the App Store.
Don't assume that because Instagram is well-known that they have more seniority and the rights and abilities to do whatever they want.
I'd call it abandoned if it didn't fit the platform standards, if it was buggy, if it didn't run on some new devices…
It also doesn't tie you to a specific ecosystem.
Disclaimer: I'm on of the authors of Genius Scan :)
Treat the causes (some of them at least), not the consequences.
I see how you can call this independent (eg. not a big hosting company), but for me the independent web is people hosting their content and keeping control on it. The ideal case is everyone hosting on their own machine (the old WWW?)
It seems to be that it's cheaper but it's hard to compare without knowing what the Heroku instances are.
Edit: Le Monde has an article on the subject (French) http://www.lemonde.fr/panama-papers/article/2016/04/04/pourq..., translated: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u...