4,019 karma · joined April 20, 2012
In other words, the customer should be able to sue for bad faith dealing. The law should recognize that forcing a customer to fight to resolve a legitimate issue causes the customer harm, and the customer is entitled to collect damages over and above any other damages they have sustained (in this case, over and above the $277).
One or more class action lawsuits would help straighten this company out.
This one was a good start: https://www.npr.org/2022/12/06/1140998674/hertz-false-accusa...
The next step is for company executives to face personal liability for failing to deal with these issues.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41574-021-00593-z
Sunlight, however, does show benefits. This suggests that Vitamin D is just a side effect of sunlight exposure, and does not by itself do any good.
Here's an idea: produce designs that use the commercial Tailwind components. Your designs will look great. Have a link for the user to buy the components if they don't already own them. Work out an affiliate deal with Tailwind Labs. You can get rid of the time limits and the pricing.
If you start generating money for them they may buy your app.
With Rust/pgrx (which I have used, extensively) memory integration is more difficult. There's pg memory, and there's Rust memory, and they're not the same, and you have to play games to pass data between them. Lifetime issues crop up. Rust might be able to solve the problem in the future with custom allocators, but it's just not there yet.
>Helicopters are more costly than airplanes, and flying with a dangling blade designed to catch wind would prove complex and dangerous.
Um, why not enclose the blade in a tube?
There are heavy-lift helicopters that can go 170 mph and carry 40 tons. No runway required.
They produced a unique game where players were given eight minutes to collect as many berries as possible by hovering a mouse pointer over a bush. Each time they foraged from the same bush a player’s harvest would slightly decline but if they moved to a new bush they would suffer a time penalty.
So what would most players do? Stick to the same reliable berry-supplying bush? Or risk wasting time by trying another bush to see if it had more fruit? Explore or exploit?
Around 450 people participated in the experiment, and all were simultaneously screened for ADHD symptoms. Unsurprisingly, the researchers found those with higher ADHD scores moved on to new bushes sooner than others but more importantly, those with ADHD also tended to collect higher volumes of berries overall.
Writing in the newly published study, Barack and colleagues noted that participants without ADHD characteristics tended to over-harvest single patches. Looking at what would be an optimal harvest strategy for the game it was discovered that players with high ADHD scores were more successful overall.
The outcome of this game is 100% dependent on the parameters: the decline in the harvest from a given bush, and the time penalty. If you change the parameters to favor persistence, then guess what, persistence wins.
>> Importantly, these test scores better position Admissions to identify high-achieving less-advantaged applicants and high-achieving applicants who attend high schools for which Dartmouth has less information to interpret the transcripts.
Precisely. SATs aren't about hurting the poor or disadvantaged. It's about giving them a chance.
The paper is tedious and near-unreadable, so I didn't finish reading it. Maybe there's something here, maybe not. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.02116.pdf
https://github.com/buzzm/postgresbson/blob/main/pgbson--2.0....
and this:
https://github.com/buzzm/postgresbson/blob/main/pgbson.c
Really nice stuff.
There are 1600 calories per pound of dried beans (https://modernsurvivalblog.com/survival-kitchen/calories-per...) 3.5 oz would contain 350 calories.
The average person needs 2,000 to 2,500 calories per day. No, this guy isn't living on 350 calories per day.
This is a good interview with Pittenger that give more detail on what his group is up to: https://aspire.care/clinicians/antibodies-pandas-bind-cins-a...
Guess what? Kids who have never had time to play are ones who have never had time to develop cool interests.
Jack Nicholson said it best (repeatedly): All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
There is something deeply wrong here. I blame other parents who overschedule their kids.
Rust makes this really, really difficult. If you can live with immutable pointers, you can have as many as you like, but the lifetime syntax you have to juggle can become a horror show, and can force lifetime annotations on a whole chain of structures. If you can't live with immutable references, then you are forced to use the unnecessarily ugly Rc<> syntax.
I often find myself using the array indexes trick, which leads to buggy code.
In Java, I never had to do this. Multiple "pointers" are fine. The garbage collector takes care of memory safety. In this one sense, Rust is a less-safe language than Java.
I have been writing Rust for two years now. I would not use it again if I could avoid it. It is a giant waste of time.
https://abc7chicago.com/book-bans-illinois-library-house-of-...
I wasn't 23 years old when I was writing these summaries. I was 21. There was no one in the office over 30, and no lawyers.
Non-competes are legit if they are narrowly limited in time and scope. It's perfectly fine for a company to demand that if they hand over their proprietary know-how to you, know-how that has cost them years to acquire, you won't take it to the competitor across the street. And no, an NDA is not enough to protect them. They own this information, not you, and no, you can't take it.
NDAs are legit for obvious reasons.
Work-for-hire clauses are absolutely required. If a company is paying you, they own what you create on company time and company equipment. No, you can't take it and sell it elsewhere. It's perfectly fine for you to resist signing a clause that says they own what you create offsite (so long as it's not related to your day job), but a company cannot continue to operate if employees can take what the company paid for.
We know there are a ton of correlations. We don't have causal links, although there is quite a bit of speculation about inflammation.