HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

carlitossway

19 karma · joined November 25, 2022

submissionscomments
carlitossway··on Earth Overshoot Day
wish you'd have expressed this better. Your argument is sound but your sarcasm gave a pretext to those not wanting to hear. Now you are dismissed out of hand on shallow grounds.
carlitossway··on Investors are happy to pay premium for tech, but not for AI
Interesting. Were you inspired by the Delphi decision algorithm, or did you happen to rediscover it? I agree it could provide a moat, though not a very wide one. All it takes is for your competition to talk to non-engineers, and all sorts of clever usages become possible.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method

carlitossway··on Stack Overflow Is Down
I'd do it, if I expected to charge $18 billion for information that the thing I just purchased used to offer for free.
carlitossway··on Taurine deficiency as a driver of aging
Why not? Everybody thinks it is God, anyways...
carlitossway··on India ruling party's IT cell used AI to show smile on arrested protesters' faces
No, they cannot. LLMs are LANGUAGE models, not KNOWLDEGE models. They do not "know" what algorithms mean any more than they know what everything else they "talk about" mean.

What they are more than capable of is to produce really convincing hype, which claims that LLMs can do anything and everything.

carlitossway··on LLMs are not greater than the sum of their parts: researchers
Yes, I am glad we have computers. I am also glad that I can code a median function that can efficiently go through a billion numbers; no need to ask the artificial averaged embodiment of millions of dumb teenagers for its duh-best-guess-lol.
carlitossway··on LLMs are not greater than the sum of their parts: researchers
And in turn, I cannot agree with you.

I can do math myself, thank you very much. If I take the effort to pull out a math calculating machine, the calculation is important enough that I want 99.99% certainty that the answer is right. Under the premise that the answer is wrong, I want 99.999% certainty that the failure is related to data capture and not the calculating mechanism itself.

Within the context of LLMs, the goal should be to make them recognize that the problem at hand is not well suited for its own set of capabilities, and to defer to an external system. In the case of ChatGPT, any numeric answer to "15+23" (including and specially "38") is wrong. The correct answer is "sorry, as a Large Language Model I can retrieve information that is encoded in English and I am not specially suited to solve math problems". A LLM-empowered Alexa may be proactive, run a Calculator program for you and report back "According to bc program, the answer is 38. Here's the full log for you to check if this is what you wanted"

This is not so much AGI as deliberate programmatic patching, not unlike the disclaimers when you ask ChatGPT about controversial topics.

carlitossway··on Uber, Amazon use AI to pay people different wages for same work: Study
One thing is to prevent the market to decide prices, and a very different thing is to let bad-faith actors to continue going around unchecked. The first scenario allows us to collectively make a bigger cake and then figure out how to share it. The second scenario allows the two biggest bullies to stomp over half of the cake while fighting who is to claim a bigger slice!

It is ok to let people with bigger appetites to eat more; but if you cannot be civil and keep wasting food, why wouldn't the others kick you out of the table?

carlitossway··on Uber, Amazon use AI to pay people different wages for same work: Study
You've just conflated having low performance with low bargaining power, which is weakly correlated at best. So...

1) Why pay less productive employees the same as more productive employees (for the same position)? Because it can be hard to measure performance, and harder to demonstrate to what degree the poor performance is direct responsibility of the employee. To some degree, it is laziness and/or sentimentalism from the employer; but if pursued to the ultimate consequences you may end up expending way more in your super perfect performance measuring infrastructure than what you will end up saving in payroll. It's way easier to turn a blind eye to small inefficiencies and firing actual slackers.

2) Why pay employees with low bargaining power as much as employees with high bargaining power for the same (or better) amount/quality of work? To some degree, every employer does this unless their workforce is unionized. The problem is, greed is an actual invariant in human nature and you do not want to live in a society that lets it run unchecked. It may be nice to save on payroll by low-balling your employees, but then it will be equally nice for Microsoft to send a horde of salesmen to hardcall your client database and offer them juicy cash incentives to drop your business and sign up for their free service...

... or for the matter, for Beaves and Butthead to try and invade your home and take as much of your property as they see fit.

carlitossway··on FBI Warns Against Using Public USB Ports Due to Malware Risk
The toggle on and off switch would be very unApplely, yes. That does not mean you have to stop thinking, it means you need industrial designers on board.

USB-condoms are a thing you know; average (and below) users know exactly what those do and can figure out how to use them in a few seconds. I bet if Apple's genius marketeers would come up with a catchy name (like the i-Safe, but cooler) those would easily sell at 3,000% the production cost. But they never will because they tarnish the brand, and make the users think their devices are not safe by default.

But then, if the device are indeed not safe by default... are we talking about criminal charges here? Would it be fraud, or what is the name of the crime where you knowingly sell hazardous stuff to the public?

carlitossway··on His software sang the words of God, then it went silent
The perfect is the enemy of the good. The way to Hell is paved in good intentions.

Just two obvious thoughts that may be relevant in this case.

carlitossway··on His software sang the words of God, then it went silent
It might be unfashionable to say these days, but... "the masses who explore the Talmud" have a much higher bar to jump than "the Masses".
carlitossway··on Changes at YC
What about demanding a salary no less than 50% of the value you add to the company? How many industries would stop being viable if their whole workforce would demand to be compensated for the worst case scenario Every single paycheck? A couple years ago this would have sounded like hyperbole, but then the Great Resignation happened, so there's that...

From that point of view, severance payments are not noble handouts but compensation strategies to reduce the overall payroll cost.

carlitossway··on Changes at YC
It is disingenuous, at best, to equate collapse to "going back to the cave age". If your house's roof collapses you do not end up in a cave. You either pay a small fortune to have it fixed or, if you lack the wealth to do so, sell it at a loss to someone who can.

Tech/IT is too valuable to be ditched altogether, so we are not going back even to the 80s or 90s. But collapse is appropriate for the kind of lean times ahead: companies getting bought on the cheap, investments evaporating, projects shelved, jobs (or even careers) lost.

carlitossway··on DoorDash lays off 1250 employees
Leaving aside other factors, you're redefining "overstays" as "not leaving the premises fast enough when told to leave before the original deadline".

And no, that's not treating them as animals. But you are not exactly a proper host either.