capr

"degrowth" ... aand this is how you spot the real agenda of most environmentalists. ofc they'll call that a "philosophy".

Most likely increase, despite your intuition. This argument has been debunked so many times both intellectually and empirically. For one, read "Against Intellectual Property" by Stephan Kinsella.

Because people want to discover if a law is principled, and "certain scale" is not a principle, is just an arbitrary utilitarian distinction.

> Should I imagine that all architects have done nothing their entire life?

Well this is awkard...

libertarian socialism is an oxymoron

> It’s not technically a tax. Taxes produce valuable public benefits, like medical research and parks. This is simply legal theft.

An economist would not read past this first sentence.

...allocated on not fixing the bugs, sure. and AI does not decide what you spend your time on.

performance specialist, really?

Strawman - it wasn't arbitrary at all.

I think "Good thing that is not your problem." includes inability to do such a thing.

Likewise for you following them blindly.

It doesn't require that at all, on the contrary. Why don't you educate yourself on these basic assumptions?

That analogy works for app code, it doesn't work for technologies, library, frameworks, algorithms. Why build a compiler for this app? YAGNI! makes no sense.

Yup, because perfect competition is fundamentally the same as the salary cap, except for companies instead of employees. Specialization leads to natural monopolies at company level just as it does at personal level. Besides, the term monopoly only makes sense when it's state-enforced. In a free market it loses meaning since every company has a monopoly on their exact product.

but that's not what they're doing. that's just you believing the rhetoric

so the doctors acted just like the LLM

That smells a lot like Facebook making a php compiler

He made an economic argument that went straight over your head.

I personally love how AI shows through sheer indifference how the whole concept of intellectual property is completely incoherent.

> Do you disagree that this person followed the law, and that politicians enacted those laws, and that we voted for these politicians?

This is the definition of brainwashing. You had a false choice between person A and person B who are mostly the same some 4 years ago, and now _you_ are responsible for every stupid policy they enact.

I don't believe any of this.

"due to voters making bad choices" ahahahahahaha

way to prove his point

Maybe if they would've let their engineers use Borland C++ they would've learned a thing or two for their own product.

And that's about the only type of visa where that happens.

try it, like these people https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7iJDMU43iUk

But profit _is_ the driving force of human action. Doing anything voluntarily is by definition profitable, otherwise you wouldn't do it.

there's absolutely something wrong with the fruits of their labor though, which I am forced to use every day

not true at all, only socialists think that (I'm also from Europe where everybody and their dog's a socialist)

compared to what? most doctors never heard of Bayes rule