[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/markdown-discuss@six.pairlist.ne...
3,663 karma · joined October 5, 2008
I'm a co-founder and CEO of Webflow (YC S13). We're cooking up some amazing tools for web designers and developers. If you're interested in joining our team, send me a note to vlad@webflow.com :)
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/markdown-discuss@six.pairlist.ne...
> Please note this change has no impact on our existing customers, including those using the free version.
Bummer.
> Please note that I (with the support of Y-Combinator) asked for the dissolution of the company and return of all funds to our investors
If you have YC's support on this, then why will they be presenting at the March demo day?
[1] http://imakewebthings.com/jquery-waypoints/sticky-elements/
In regards to IP, it's always a cost vs benefit tradeoff. It was quite refreshing to hear pretty much every partner we spoke to say "just focus on building something awesome and focus on the hard legal stuff later," instead of pushing us down the (more beneficial to them in the short term) path of securing patents, etc.
Edit: Nice, just noticed changes on your site. You guys are fast.
If you're interested in bleeding edge HTML5 experiments, you can watch Paul Irish interview him here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogumRA9LxR4
- I hit the arrow key to go to the menu, and choose "A Personal API". So far so good.
- I click on the arrow again, it just fades out. Ok... let's try the back button. That removes the hash from the URL, but I'm still on "A Personal API". Pressing Forward adds the hash back, but there are no changes on the page.
The only option I have to keep navigating is to refresh the page.
I'm on Chrome Canary, and I'm not seeing any errors in the console. On my iPhone, the arrow button seems to work to go back to the menu, but the back button is also broken.
As of now, with 23 hours left to go, they are only short $25K, so it seems almost inevitable that the target will be met.
* The product may be placed on the market only if it complies with the provisions of all applicable directives and if the conformity assessment procedure has been carried out accordingly.
* If stipulated in the directive(s), an authorized third party (Notified Body) must be involved in the conformity assessment procedure.
I'm not sure if the machine directive stipulates it, but "authorized third party" seems to imply that the manufacturer can't perform the certification themselves.
Even if you can count yourself as the approving company, did you make sure that your product complies with all the provisions? Or were you taking advantage of some loophole somewhere to skip the entire process?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CE_marking
EDIT: I see that you mentioned this was 15 years ago, so I'm mostly curious for historical reasons.
Even though they are not old enough to realize it yet, my kids were the ones who inspired me to start something, and they are still my biggest inspiration. When they're older, I want them to look back and be proud of the (albeit tiny) dent that their dad made in the universe.
I really do hope that the concentrated effort now will lead to much more shared time and adventures down the road.