cactusplant7374

Because engineers are lusting for 1000 tokens per second. You can only achieve something like that with OpenAI.

The link doesn't work.

I think your argument would be stronger if you claimed introspection is only a feature of humans.

I have used a simple feedback loop to generate AI art: 1) the initial prompt 2) ask for criticism of the generated image 3) apply those changes and generate another image 4) repeat the criticism / fix cycle again

Isn't that somewhat introspective?

Ultrafast uses 6x the usage. They probably realize that people will complain if the plan limits are too low. In any case, the TCO of the newer chips is supposedly lower. Hopefully everyone is on ultrafast eventually.

The biggest donor is Elon Musk.

Was he paid to review the paper? His praise reads very unauthentic.

> After reviewing the pre-print, Feng Zhang, one of the pioneers of CRISPR genome editing and a professor at MIT and the Broad Institute said:

> This is an exciting example of how AI agents can contribute to biological discovery. The identification of RNA-repeat arrays associated with reverse transcriptases is genuinely intriguing and merits further investigation. I hope this work encourages more scientists to explore how AI can support their research.

> Ángela Karime Venegas Hernández is 16 years old and has an idea no one else had.

Hate to be a downer, but this has been done before.

https://acoustics.org/pressroom/httpdocs/150th/Plaks.html

And HN users are being used as part of these attacks?

This isn't about you personally. There is a public interest here.

I can't control their behavior nor can you. But if you don't want to respond to the substance of my comment then perhaps you shouldn't respond?

It tells us that the moderators of HN support copyright infringement and DDOS attacks. They are actively moderating this forum and choosing to do nothing.

It is telling that HN moderators allow links to archive.is/today

It 404s now. DMCA?

Codex has 20+ million users. They are doing much better than Cursor.

What company fired them? I don't see that in the repo but maybe I missed it.

It is incredibly cheap now. What sectors are you thinking of?

2AM CST

There are no off-peak hours. I have received the model overloaded error that cancels my current goal during the early hours of the morning.

Codex has 20 million users and growing. There is a possibility that they take a huge chunk of the coding agent market share.

OpenAI has a free tier. I'm guessing a lot of people never need to upgrade. Not the case for me but I can see the average person only needing to run a few prompts every day.

Dario said in an interview that they originally wanted to be an enterprise only company.

In Cuenca, EC you have a lot of retirees and a few digital nomads. Most people don’t make a big move to spend more money than they would in their home country. So they frequent all of the same small local businesses and markets as the locals. No one learns Spanish so some money funnels into interpreters and facilitators. I ended up spending a lot of money on restaurants started by immigrants because I don’t like Ecuadorian cuisine that much. All of this to say that the money is distributed more than one might think.

I'm working on emulators with AOT and JIT.

Yes, with a few exceptions. It's much easier now that the five hour limit has been removed from codex.

One of my projects has an estimate of 3,000+ hours. It seems accurate. It has spent months working on it.

Probably managing and mentoring. I has a boss that wanted to code and be CTO. Just horrible.

The US government would never allow a sale. Frontier intelligence given away? It is the ASML story all over again. I would hope we have learned our lesson.

Not everything needs to be optimized. Probably only rich people would engage in such a scheme anyway.

I'm asking this earnestly: What is the value proposition of Vercel when AI agents can create a Dockerfile and deploy a project in minutes?