331 karma · joined June 10, 2021
However based on this article "The idea was to make the area simultaneously green, smart, and sustainable." These are just buzzwords put together, it means nothing. WCC seems like didn't know what they wanted so they went over to these guys with buzzwords check list. And mvrdv just accepted the project for whatever reason (I'm sure good reasons) where they should have asked way more questions to understand what these guys actually wanted.
He would have always be reliant on others who can be put under pressure to remove jre from their platform
I have to say, I am quite resentful of people now. Because there was such amazing tool that you could learn other people's view and thoughts and a handful of loud mouths killed it.
Can someone explain what happens when a company as large as this decides to file such a law suit?
Is it such low costs that you might as well just argue whatever you want and see what happens? Or are there internal teams counter arguing to check validity of such law suit?
I took this job with a pay cut so that I can do more coding as my previous experience was mostly support.
But after two years I haven't done that much coding.
Currently I wear too many hats too, and very little experience in any one them.
For one everyone is looking to hire talent but not develop them. This means that most companies don't have talent development plan.
There are huge amount of engineers who have kids and mortgage that they need to pay off, so for the right price they will work on any none cool tech.
Say the eks team responsible to deliver a cli/console tooling?
It's an interesting problem to solve. Any insight on how to go about managing this is greatly appreciated.
Edit: I am not a great coder by any means. I just don't like to waste my time when it's clear I am not a fit for the company or the role.