10,294 karma · joined June 30, 2015
If you have a specific question about r/relationship_advice, message me on Reddit instead.
I wonder how much of this is because folks in the supply chain might not be aware of what asbestos looks like.
2¹⁹ bytes, or 512KiB.
Most people don't exploit the full capacity of their bodies and so would never notice, which is essentially the point OP is making. This disease very likely ravaged the 20% claimed, but the vast majority may never know because they're just never pushing their bodies hard enough.
1. Finland
2. Denmark
3. Iceland
4. Sweden
5. Netherlands
It's just an interesting assertion you're making, I suppose.
-40F=-40C
-22F=-30C
-4F =-20C
14F =-10C
32F = 0C
50F = 10C
68F = 20C
86F = 30C
104F= 40C
and then approximate in between from there. It's quick enough for me now that I skip the 2x+30.
But the wrist/hand control is the thing that impressed me the most in today's release. I'd hope for this to go far beyond just the glasses.
Referring to your "poisons the populace" comment. Do you have evidence substantiating your suggestion that lab-grown salmon will "poison" people? I'm substantially curious because as I understand it, the risk of heavy metal poisoning and parasites commonly found in wild salmon are eliminated when lab grown.
This is a globally unique phrase, with nothing coming close other than this comment on the indexed web. It's also seemingly an original idea as I haven't heard anyone come close to describing a feeling (love or anything else) quite like this.
Food for thought. I'm not brave enough to draw a public conclusion about what this could mean.
I tease. Folks have strong opinions on the topic.
> Among the GHS projects killed were some dedicated to *monitoring and containing avian flu and New World Screwworm in Central America, monitoring* avian flu outbreaks in Asia and improving the detection of new strains, and efforts to combat swine fever, according to a person familiar with the situation granted anonymity to speak frankly.
you might not have intended to mislead, but the cited source indicates that at least some were defined and thus halted, in partial contradiction to your line "Screwworm detection and prevention was not halted because of the USAID shutdown"
This is also why review aggregators exist: if I'm just getting into a thing, such as watching movies or buying appliances, I probably need a general sense of how people collectively feel about a thing. But if I'm keenly aware of my preferences, it helps me to find reviewers who align with how I think. People routinely seek out specific reviewers or specific publications for this reason.
For instance, someone reading this review might conclude "I really appreciate that ease of use is a topic that's front of mind with this reviewer." Another reviewer's focus might be customizability, and they might recommend AirGradient. And that reviewer's audience follows that person likely because those concerns are front of mind.
...to be honest, if AirGradient had responded more along those lines ("we prioritized X and Y. We understand if this isn't the best fit for customers looking for Z, but we're working on it"), it would've felt more empathetic and less combative to me.
• Product A has limited features but does them well. If the customer is okay with the features the product has, the reviewer can recommend it for this customer.
• Product B has more features but is impacted by QA issues as well as product design decisions that make those features harder to use. This impacts the ability of the customer to use features they might've paid for to use the product, and it may even impact their ability to use features core to other products. This potentially makes Product B less desirable for comparable use cases.
With this in mind, I'm inclined to agree with Wired's decision.
But the punitive damages at $200 million are appropriate — it's what the jury thought would be appropriate to discourage Tesla's behaviors.
(Clarified my comment to "prevent" from "override" since overrides broadly exist - per jeroenhd's comment - but it seems in this case the argument was that the feature never engaged)
The driver took the fair share of the blame for actually making the decision, but the driver's defense that a feature called "autopilot" would supposedly intervene is exactly the kind of marketing gimmick that needs to be penalized.
It shouldn't have taken injury and death to get to this point.
What incentive would Amazon have to drop prices after vertical integration is done?
The people wouldn't, but in the environments I'm thinking of, security policies might.
What you're leaning into is a high-risk backup strategy that would rely mostly on luck to get something remotely close to the current version back online. It's pretty reckless.
Oh boy.
Tons of apps in maintenance mode run critical infrastructure and see few commits in a year.
Speculating: there may be parallels between this and other fields with entirely unnecessary artistic expression. Think watchmaking where watch movements with superlative finishing are celebrated and often command premium pay (e.g watches with the Geneva Seal). Beyond a certain point, the finishing adds absolutely nothing to the watch aside from showcasing talent.
There's something to the idea that if someone spent a ton of effort building something, even if it's superfluous, it garners a level of trust in the end product.
For instance, how many companies do you think have played with dedicated identities for each instance of their agents? Let alone hard-restricting those identities (not via system prompts but with good old fashioned access controls) to only the data and functions they're supposed to be entitled to for just that session?
It's a pretty slim number. Only reason I'm not guessing zero is because it wouldn't surprise me if maybe one company got it right. But if there was a way to prove that nobody's doing this right, I'd bet money on it for laughs. These are things that in theory we should've been doing before AI happened, and yet it's all technical debt alongside every "low" or "medium" risk for most companies because up until now, no one could rationalize the spend.
Relatedly: it validates that people are assholes for making fun of others who are overweight. And not many people like feeling like an asshole.
Edit: starlevel004 is right.
In fairness to op, the proposed solution seems best intended for comms blackouts in densely populated areas rather than areas with persistently limited access.
• https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1113/jphy...
I don't know whether Amazon relies on LLMs or SLMs for this and for similar interactions, but it makes tons of financial sense to use SLMs for narrowly scoped agents. In use cases like customer service, the intelligence behind LLMs is all wasted on the task the agents are trained for.
Wouldn't surprise me if down the road we start suggesting role-specific SLMs rather than general LLMs as both an ethics- and security-risk mitigation too.