414 karma · joined January 25, 2010
Email: bruce.hart@gmail.com
https://github.com/brucehart
https://linkedin.com/in/hartbruce
I think such a strategy would only work for marquee brands. Apple can get away with a store with nothing but Apple products, but I wouldn't want to buy a TV from a store that only sold LGs. I would want to compare across brands since there is little to differentiate an LG from a Sharp or Samsung.
I have college basketball season tickets and my online account is integrated with TicketsNow (one click to electronically list my tickets to any game). I've tried using it as a seller and have had no interest in my tickets. The same tickets usually sell within a few days on StubHub.
As a buyer, I have checked TicketsNow on occasion and rarely find any tickets available for the event. One time I did find a great deal: 5th row center court tickets to a sold out game at face value. I think I got them because no other buyers had looked on the site.
A student in my class looked over my shoulder and saw me run my script in the lab. I thought she was just going to ask if she could have a copy of it, but instead she angrily accused me of plagiarism. When I asked where I was supposedly plagiarizing from, she instead just accused me of cheating. She went up to our professor in class and demanded that I received no credit for the assignment. The grades in this class were not curved in any way, so my grade would have no impact on her's. Luckily, the professor just laughed at her and said "What? I'm supposed to give him an F for being smarter than you? Write your own damn script if it's that useful.".
I wonder if this more of a tribute to P.T. Barnum (the first subject mentioned in the article) than Abraham Lincoln.
Google needs to give people a compelling reason to try out the service. Remember when GMail launched in 2004 and 1 GB of storage space for e-mail seemed crazy? I think Hotmail offered 4 MB of space at the time. You had to constantly delete old e-mails to keep below the quota. Storing files in the cloud is reaching a tipping point where it becomes mainstream. Google needs to get a foothold now if they want to be the leader in this product category.
For Linux, try Duplicity (which I mentioned in another comment): http://duplicity.nongnu.org/
Both are open source and have similar features to Arq (including Amazon S3 support).
The last time I went there was about a year ago when my Dad wanted to buy a 60" LCD TV. The selection was poor and confusingly scattered across different sections. When we asked a sales guy for help, the first question he asked is if we needed an HDMI cable to go with the TV (that hadn't been picked out yet). When I said we didn't need to buy a cable the sales person stopped helping us and left. We walked out of the store empty handed.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought this practice was pretty standard across the industry. The "unscrupulous" registrar tactics that I'm more concerned about are registrars that take domains when they sense demand (such as from searching or whois lookups) and hold it from you until you pay a premium. I've never had this issue with name.com and have found it very easy to transfer domains with them as well.
The mobile ad space at the moment reminds me of when AdSense came out a few years ago and all these web site were making huge amounts of money. Eventually Google tightened the rules and advertisers got a better handle on the real value of the ads. Now it is much more difficult to make good money unless you have a very high traffic site.