HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

brooklyndavs

187 karma · joined May 30, 2014

submissionscomments
brooklyndavs··on A Confession of Liberal Intolerance
“I am the equivalent of someone who was gay in Mississippi in 1950,”

Oh give me a F*ing break. You CHOOSE to be a conservative. You aren't born a conservative and face true harassment, discrimination, and death threats because of it. Oh, right thats what YOU would do to someone who is gay probably now if you could get away with it.

You are being passed for jobs in academia partly because academia deals in truths and evangelical Christians usually have a world view lacking in many truths. Personally, yeah I would pass you for an academic job if I found out you were an evangelical christian. How can I trust you to know truths in your profession when you believe in complete nonsense like the earth began 2,000 years ago and that evolution doesn't exist. How can I trust you NOT to evangelize in the classroom? Isn't that the whole point of being an evangelical Christian?

Get over it. Religious extremism in ALL FORMS is a cancer and needs to be eliminated from society. Join the rest of the modern world or be further relegated to the edge as you so rightfully deserve to be.

brooklyndavs··on San Andreas fault 'ready' with big earthquake, expert says
If the infrastructure is up to the task and it would actually be doable (say release fault pressure with a magnitude 5 earthquake every 3 years via some sort of method) it might not be such a bad idea. Way easier to build for a planned magnitude 5.x quake every few years vs a 7 or 8 at unknown time intervals.

Heck it could even be fun. Make it a holiday, tell people the time its going to happen and let them ride it out. Personally, I'd be at a bar. :)

brooklyndavs··on Cheap Solar Power
A bit off topic....

Currently Hydro power makes up a small (6%) but significant portion of the energy mix in the US.

https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=427&t=3

When you look at just the clean energy sources in the US this percentage is greater obviously. Also, other countries rely more on Hydro than the US (Canada and China come to mind).

Has there been modeling done on what global warming will do to those Hydro power sources? For example, I can imagine drought is not good for reliable Hydro power. Has declining Hydro power been accounted for in possible future clean energy mixes?

brooklyndavs··on Catching a Flight? Budget Hours, Not Minutes, for Security
Maybe this will get enough people to FINALLY start demanding funding for high speed rail corridors. I can't imaging getting to the airport, waiting in line for like 2 hours and then getting on a 45 min flight to Portland from Seattle.

Its crazy that the US doesn't have true high speed rail on the northeast corridor and the other high speed rail corridors identified such as between Chicago and St. Louis. Many other counties have HSR so its obviously a matter of priorities.

I know the current California HSR project is a bit of a mess but instead of abandoning HSR altogether we should find out why it's a mess and try to streamline projects like this going forward.

Hyperloop will be cool once/if its built, but for now HSR is the only game in town for fast ground transportation that moves a lot of people.

brooklyndavs··on How Cheap Can Electric Vehicles Get?
The irony, or market working I guess, is that as demand for gas and fossil fuel goes down so does the price. This keeps the incentive to keep burning gas. During this recent price drop larger vehicle sales with worse gas mileage increased. I live in a city myself and its hard to realize this when all you see are smaller cars around, but in suburban, rural, Texas, larger gas vehicle are still the rule vs the exception it seems.

> Horses were obsolete within 15 years of private automobiles being a thing - by 1920 more freight was hauled and more passenger-miles were travelled by internal combustion than horse, in the US.

I'm not quite sure the analogy fits exactly. This is because the production (breeding?) of horses wasn't the most profitable industry man has every created. Remember still some of the most profitable companies in the world are fossil fuel companies. Exxon is still #2 and Chevron is #5. Also, unlike a company like Apple, they have been this way for decades. Brutal dictators are propped from oil. Entire countries rely on oil for their very existence. Due the the shear amount of money involved I do not see fossil fuels going quietly into the night based on market forces alone. As long as they are cheaper and more convenient for humanity we will use them. What we really need, in my opinion, is to #1 end the ridiculous subsidies that fossil fuel companies get and #2 enact a carbon tax where we give the proceeds of this tax to fund renewable energy research and to help out the millions of workers who will loss their jobs from the transition off of fossil fuels.

Here's another way of looking at it. In the 90s we had the big tobacco thing. 7 of these executives lied under oath that tobacco wasn't addictive. After countless hearings, lawsuits with rewards of the billions of $$$, high use taxes around the world, some of these companies are still around. People still use their products. They are expanding into emerging countries, vaping and maybe even weed. They are using trade protections to expand into those emerging markets.

Now take an industry, make it more profitable and give it millions of federal tax breaks and subsidies. Oh and instead of an economy of say Virginia or North Carolina based off of it have economies like Russia, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Nigeria owe their development from it.

I'm not saying we can't migrate off of fossil fuels. It needs to happen, and happen very quickly. However, its important to understand the shear size of the problem at hand.

brooklyndavs··on SpaceX plans to debut Red Dragon with 2018 Mars mission
It's not being culturally sensitive for sensitivities sake. It's about an equal chance of survival. Most fairly intelligent people acknowledge having one planet for the human species is risky right? What if an asteroid is on a collision course with Earth? We better spread out to hedge our bets. Which leads me to...

> can you afford it

Now, if all was fine and dandy on Earth and some rich people want to take the risk of starting a Mars colony with the idea that most of us will be able to travel back and forth in a hundred years go for it.

The problem is, there is an asteroid on a collision course with Earth. Oh, and the asteroid was created with help from some of the people trying to now escape. The asteroid is global warming. I can go into great detail on how global warming is going to make things incredibly challenging for the 9+ billion of us around on Earth in 2050. At least to Elon's credit he's doing some things that might make living in a warmer world a little more sustainable before he jets off to Mars. Most people that will be able to pay the price won't be doing so.

Wouldn't be more ethical to focus on saving the one planet most of us and our kids will live on? Lets say the Mars colony is successful. So successful that you and your families chances of surviving are actually better on Mars vs Earth. What gives you and your offspring the right for that greater chance of survival? Because you are rich? What about executive XYZ who lead company ABC for 20 years and used our air and water as a dumping ground for pollution. What gives them the right to leave? What gives them and their offspring the right to survive and thrive on another planet while us on earth deal with the cost of that pollution. As I said, it would be the ultimate FU to 99.9% of us.

brooklyndavs··on SpaceX plans to debut Red Dragon with 2018 Mars mission
Eh from what I am seeing access is fairly regulated.

http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ia/permits/highseas.html

http://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-2/fisheries/deep-sea-fish...

Status quo seems to be not good enough on the enforcement end, which leads to illegal overfishing.

brooklyndavs··on SpaceX plans to debut Red Dragon with 2018 Mars mission
I know, and then humanity will have destroyed the last remaining wilderness on Earth and the ecosystem that goes along with it. Looking at our collective history we should know better. How tragic.
brooklyndavs··on SpaceX plans to debut Red Dragon with 2018 Mars mission
Ah! There is a big difference, I believe between subcontracting LEO for NASA and a frikin Mars mission.

Since so far everything is done for NASA I don't have a problem with it. NASA, like any giant government agency subcontracts out a lot of work to various parties. The whole "Military-industrial complex" thing. In the case of LEO where it's NASA controlled but privately contracted SpaceX is awesome because they are bringing down the cost of launches to LEO. This saves us, the US taxpayer $$$.

The frikin Mars mission is different because from what I understand SpaceX is going with or without NASA. That's the difference between an Apollo mission, where the Saturn V was developed by Boeing and others, and Boeing just going alone.

Personally, I think this legislation is a bad idea and is a direct attack on a global common. It will be interesting to see how this holds up internationally. Its almost like the US saying to the world we open up waters in the middle of the Atlantic (international waters) for resource extraction by any of our corporations. Try and stop us.

brooklyndavs··on SpaceX plans to debut Red Dragon with 2018 Mars mission
Good, it should be harder for SpaceX and other completely private entities to go since space is identified as a public Common (see my comment above).

Its not sour grapes. When Neil Armstrong went to the moon it was for all Americans and all of Humanity. During the space shuttle missions there was a public effort to try to select a broad representation of cultures, backgrounds, educations, nationalities etc to be astronauts.

However, if the only ultra rich get to go, which it sounds like the case since that would be the only way to fund a private mission, why should everyone left be ok with it? Why should the richest people in the world, most who have had a incredibly large role in environmentally destroying the ONLY planet all of humanity can live on, just leave everyone else to clean up the mess? It would be the ultimate FU to the rest of the 99.9% of humanity.

http://www.theverge.com/2015/11/24/9792854/neil-degrasse-tys...

brooklyndavs··on SpaceX plans to debut Red Dragon with 2018 Mars mission
Yes! Or it should as humanity has identified Antartica as a Common. Just because you are an international corporation doesn't mean you get to violate international law.

Unfortunately, the environmental protection protocol is open for review in 2048. This will probably roll back the protections in place for the environment of Antartica :(

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_on_Environmental_Prot...

brooklyndavs··on SpaceX plans to debut Red Dragon with 2018 Mars mission
They still have relevance. Lets take the Antartica treaty for example. Lets, for the sake of argument, say only one entity has the knowledge, resources, etc to reach Antartica and this entity is a subsidiary of BP. BP-Antartica lets say. BP-Antartica wants to drill for oil. This would still be a violation of international law under the treaty that governs Antartica. Same thing applies, or should apply to SpaceX or any other entity (public or private) with regard to any existing and future space treaties.

"International law identifies Antarctica and outer space as two of four global commons (the others being the high seas and the atmosphere). Both have been defined within international regimes as spaces outside the territory of nation states and beyond the normative inhabitable zones of the human species. In both instances the current governance regime were outcomes of the International Geophysical Year (IGY) (1957-1958)."

http://phys.org/news/2015-08-antarctica-key-space.html

Specifically in the Antartica treaty:

"No acts or activities taking place while the present Treaty is in force shall constitute a basis for asserting, supporting or denying a claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica or create any rights of sovereignty in Antarctica. No new claim, or enlargement of an existing claim to territorial sovereignty in Antarctica shall be asserted while the present Treaty is in force."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty_System

brooklyndavs··on SpaceX plans to debut Red Dragon with 2018 Mars mission
Agree, I'm interested in the political aspect of this as well. For most of modern history (past WWII lets say) exploration of unknown frontiers (Antartica, space, the moon etc) has been done under nation states with various levels of funding from governments either at 100% public or a public/private mix. This exploration is done usually with the end goal of expanding human knowledge or sometimes for national defense as in the space race and the moon.

What makes me SUPER uneasy about what SpaceX is trying to do with Mars is the 100% private nature of this, at least from an ownership perspective. Is SpaceX trying to claim ownership to Mars, or a least a part of it? Who or what gives them the right to make this claim? Wouldn't humanity as a whole be better served to see Mars the same way we see Antartica?

Additionally, why does SpaceX get to say who goes to Mars and who doesn't? Shouldn't we choose who gets to go on missions to Mars based on expertise in technical and scientific fields vs how much one can pay for a ticket? Why should the ability to go to Mars be based capital? Does a little child who wants to be an astronaut also need to be a billionaire? Ultimately, what gives the super rich the right to leave this planet for a colony on Mars while the rest of us try to figure out how to survive on the planet that they had a large hand in destroying in the first place. Why should we, as a society, even support a colony on Mars that will take many years to be self sustaining in the above configuration.

Hopefully our international bodies wake up and start taking the privatization of space seriously and at least start enacting and enforcing some guidelines, regulations, and treaties around space and bodies in our solar system.

brooklyndavs··on Whatup
<blink>whatup</blink>
brooklyndavs··on Warmest March in Global Recordkeeping
Are you trolling us? 97% of climate scientists agree that the global is warming and that humans are the cause of this warming.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-...

Before it was the warmest March on record it was the warmest February:

http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/february-smashe...

Oh, and it was the warmest January:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2016/02/17/january_...

Oh and 2015 was the warmest year on record:

http://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-2015-became-the-hott...

Chart of temps from 1880:

http://www.skepticalscience.com//pics/2c-2016-02.png

CO2 is at 408ppm and climbing as it nears it's seasonal peak.

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/weekly.html

This is a level not seen in the past 15 million years

https://robertscribbler.com/2016/04/11/hothouse-gas-spikes-t...

Here's a chart that looks at some other greenhouse gases, such as methane.

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi.html

brooklyndavs··on Vim 8.0 is coming
To piggy back on this, in general how do you balance the time between switching out a toolset vs doing development work? For example, I've been using PyCharm for years but the switch in JetBrains's licensing strategy has me looking at Vim or Neovim. I use Vim from time to time just as a quick editor but I really need to sit down and learn it inside out to make it a useful tool for me. Is this something where you start incorporating it into each project or is it a situation where you just sit down with the tool for a few days and learn it inside out? Curious about people's thoughts on this.
brooklyndavs··on Facebook is King, Other Networks Fight for Scraps
Facebook ceased to be cool once Mom, Dad and that crazy Aunt were on it :)
brooklyndavs··on It's a Tesla
Unless your child lives close to a power plant, or a mining operation, or a fracking operation, or somewhere vulnerable to sea level rise....
brooklyndavs··on It's a Tesla
I wish I could share this outlook but I see a few things slowing the installation velocity of zero emission energy generation. These are a mix of technological and political. What we are seeing currently in the install velocity is probably the low hanging/small scale projects in politically favorable states (in the US anyway).

On the technological side as projects get bigger they are running into issues. Take the large solar plant in California for example:

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/601071/one-of-the-worlds-...

Naturally, these are typical issues that we see when scaling any new technology up for the first time. They will be resolved, but how soon?

Secondly, and this is probably the bigger issue, without a Manhattan like project for zero emissions energy production the political drive to switch will be painfully slow. Remember how much MONEY there is in fossil fuels and these companies are not going to go silently into the night. There are large states where significant numbers of americans live (think Texas, Arizona, Florida) where the politicians won't even acknowledge global warming! (IE see who funds the campaigns). Homeowners in Oklahoma face a fee for using solar.

http://www.climatecentral.org/news/oklahoma-solar-surcharge-...

Nevada got rid of net metering

http://www.marketplace.org/2016/02/23/world/nevada-solar

There was this collapse of the Cape Cod wind project last year...

https://www.bostonglobe.com/magazine/2015/01/30/what-really-...

Even though we NEED to be off fossil fuels for energy generation in 12-15 years I fear we won't be anywhere close.

The best thing that can be done for the near term is limit consumption as much as possible until we are completely off ALL fossil fuels.

brooklyndavs··on It's a Tesla
"Electric cars get cleaner every year because of this. Gas cars will always burn gas their entire life."

This might be true in the future but we aren't there yet unfortunately. This is due to the incorrect assumption that natural gas is a clean bridge fuel. Once you take into account the methane emissions/leaks from natural gas you end up with a fuel just as bad as coal and oil from a global warming perspective. This is due to methane being very dangerous greenhouse gas in the sort term (now - 100yr time period). This plus the emissions required to produce any consumer product like a car probably means for now electric cars not much better than a traditional gas car.

The only way to make these cars truly emissions free is to remove ALL carbon based energy from the chain. That includes car and battery production, charging, maintenance, and disposal. Until you do that your just switching the source of emissions around. The climate system doesn't care if the greenhouse gas comes from a car or a power plant.

The best thing we could do in the short term until we have a 100% green grid is to hold off on buying the car and walk/ride a bike :)

http://www.thenation.com/article/global-warming-terrifying-n...

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL067987/abst...

brooklyndavs··on Silicon Valley’s Unchecked Arrogance
"Too much and for too long, we seemed to have surrendered personal excellence and community values in the mere accumulation of material things. Our Gross National Product, now, is over $800 billion dollars a year, but that Gross National Product - if we judge the United States of America by that - that Gross National Product counts air pollution and cigarette advertising, and ambulances to clear our highways of carnage. It counts special locks for our doors and the jails for the people who break them. It counts the destruction of the redwood and the loss of our natural wonder in chaotic sprawl. It counts napalm and counts nuclear warheads and armored cars for the police to fight the riots in our cities. It counts Whitman's rifle and Speck's knife, and the television programs which glorify violence in order to sell toys to our children. Yet the gross national product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education or the joy of their play. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. It measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country, it measures everything in short, except that which makes life worthwhile. And it can tell us everything about America except why we are proud that we are Americans."

- Robert F Kennedy

brooklyndavs··on America's High School Graduates Look Like Other Countries' High School Dropouts
Really? Article V Section 8:

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

The interpretation of "gerneral Welfare" varies of course, but providing SOME sort of standards and funding at the federal level for education is well within accepted US federal authority.

brooklyndavs··on Intermittent Fasting Is Gaining Acceptance
Your experience is interesting to me. I'm a runner as well and I end up doing several races per year including a marathon, a few 1/2s, few 5k and 10ks. Do you do any interval training or long runs on the days you fast? What do you do about post run nutrition replacement and do you do glucose replacement during your longer runs? I'd love to shave off a few pounds for racing reasons as well. I always find myself eating more as I up my milage anyway so my weight usually stays constant.
brooklyndavs··on We Hire the Best, Just Like Everyone Else
I use to be in the enterprise "consulting" gig. As a consultant its terrible. The only rate you know is what you are making, and thats just at the per year level. As the consultant you never know what is being changed to the client and so you never know your actual worth. Rates are probably the closest guarded secret for consulting firms. Plus you are a profit center to the consulting company but a cost center to the client. So there is the horrible pull between your management to "maximize the billable hour" and the client wanting to keep costs on the project down. Oh, and god forbid you are on a flat rate project where the only limit is time. Be prepared to work 80hrs and have no life.

I've seen two reasons why mega insurance company inc brings in "consultants." One is the consultant is specialized in an area of tech that is completely outside of the companies expertise. I did some of this being in a niche area of enterprise security. While those contracts still suck they suck a little less because you are at least advising the company and getting them up to speed on something. The other type, and the most common type is the "staff augmentation". I've been on those projects too and its exactly how they seem. The company has some in house knowledge (say a manager of infrastructure and maybe one full time employee for that tech) but the rest is really about throwing bodies at a project. From the client's perspective its all about workforce flexibility and not having the expense of a full time employee on the books. Even at like 100/hr its cheaper I guess for them vs having a full time employee. Plus its not their "core business" although in 2016 I'd argue if you are running a company it's insane not to think of tech as part of your "core business."

Overall, between the unsteady work, travel, etc being an enterprise consultant sucks. Most people that I know go into it because the potential to make a bit more money vs a traditional job at mega insurance company inc is there and they don't like the idea of working for mega insurance company inc for years. However, I've been on contracts where the project is like two years long so you might as well be working for mega insurance company inc anyway.

brooklyndavs··on We Hire the Best, Just Like Everyone Else
Between this and the software engineer vs developer article that was on the front page yesterday I really am starting to think if our industry needs to start taking some sort of industry wide recognized professional certificate into consideration. I know IEEE offers some but I've never met anyone who actually has one.

I love how egalitarian software development and engineering is but I think the root of the problem is I as a hiring manager don't trust you can do the things you say you can do. So I'm going to use a test/trail period/white-boarding session to find that out. While making it a little less open an industry wide certificate would at least certify a minimal skill set level for everyone.

brooklyndavs··on We Hire the Best, Just Like Everyone Else
Completely agree. Do accountants have to work on the companies books for 8 weeks as a "trial period"? Does a mechanical engineer have to build widget X on the spot during the interview process? No, for most jobs they look at your background, talk to you about your experience, talk to your references, etc. And if they don't work out, even after some coaching and career development? Lay them off.

And don't give me xyz about how hard it is to fire someone. Owners with people working for them in other professions don't seem to have this problem and they lay people off at will.

I know that owners and funders are trying to reduce risk as much as possible and this is one way they feel like they can. However, as the article even states, startups fail for all sorts of reasons. Newsflash, staring and running a company is a risky thing to do! Thats why if you succeed there is a large reward!

brooklyndavs··on Tech workers are increasingly looking to leave Silicon Valley
Wow, your housing in Brooklyn is MORE affordable vs SV? What neighborhood are you in? Brooklyn has some of the highest housing costs in the country and is on par with Manhattan at times depending on the neighborhood.
brooklyndavs··on Canadians don’t live as far north as you think
Thats funny. I wonder if the same coworker from Atlanta would make the same comment about a city like Chicago? I've spent years in both Chicago and Toronto in the past and it seems like the climate is almost identical. Toronto maybe being a touch colder in the winter, but not by much. Summer I remember was almost identical (hot and humid). Chicago also has that classic continental climate, as does most of the upper midwest.

Actually, I think the climate on the south side of Lake Ontario is a bit warmer and wetter (thus the lake effect snow). The cold air is moderated a bit as it crosses over the lakes, but it also picks up all that moisture. In fact, I think the windward side of all the Great Lakes are similar and might be in different climate zones vs the leeward side of the lakes. I know in Western Michigan for example there is a bit of a fruit belt because of this.

brooklyndavs··on 150 Years of Immigration in America, Visualized
This is very cool. On this note, I'd like to highly recommend the immigration museum on Ellis Island in NY. It gives you a complete history of migration to the US from the first migrants into the colonies to present day. I think its a must see for anyone visiting or living in NYC.
brooklyndavs··on The collaboration curse
Innovation == Talking about what we did that weekend? :)

This was cruel and there is no excuse why in 2016 this arrangement couldn't work for a week or two.

As a remote member of a mostly onsite team there is some validity that you miss out on the SOCIAL aspects of work (grabbing lunch, hanging out after work from time to time, etc) but the "innovation" on our team is just fine.

← PreviousPage 2 of 3Next →