breezybottom

Sounds like it's just telling you what you want to hear. ADHD is when you can't focus, or when you focus too much. Really meaningful label then.

ADHD is an inability to focus. ChatGPT diagnosed you incorrectly.

Because the shoes fits. Racing thoughts, high energy, highly distractible, detachment from reality and delusions of grandeur. Next comes the crash.

It sounds like you're experiencing a manic episode.

Central limit theorem

A bunch of highly paid administrators were hired to use AI to generate it.

I'm shocked, shocked, that they recommend hiring more administrators and forming more committees to study the problem.

Maybe JK Rowling?

If you're hacking a US-based entity, using a high-performance Chinese model through a VPN is probably safe enough. I doubt a local model is going to be sufficiently smart to hack any major company.

I don't think it's a question of design. Some ideas in stats are just fundamentally unintuitive. Pedagogy can help mitigate this, but it would take a revolution to fit it into a neat and intuitive framework, like calculus.

Those are terrible metrics. But even by those standards the US is worse.

I'm trying to think of a single metric by which the EU hasn't been a massive success.

Who gets the veto over the democratic process? You?

Since when do AI companies care about the law? Most of their training data is pirated.

Since when do AI companies care about copyright law? They're destroying them so their competitors can't use them.

They absolutely do. Meta torrented 81 terabytes of ebooks. They just have no incentive to pay when the law looks the other way.

They don't "force" anything. Trillion dollar AI companies and their owners have as much agency as book publishers.

Your writing tendencies must be quite bad if Claude's tendencies are an improvement. Isn't writing a skill issue?

Most productive isn't necessarily the same as "best".

Lol that's a good one. AI slop is the least likely way to make me open my wallet.

Sure, but LLM use is a warning sign of developer laziness.

Karenified? This isn't reddit.

That's a distinction without a difference. Either way it produces the same slop.

Articles are for academic promotion, obviously.

It doesn't have to look pretty, but there should be a human brain involved in creating it. How can we trust models based on AI slop?

Solution to what?

Well all digital music is data, so yes.

"Claude does candy bar has sugar?"

"Claude does Fruity Loop has sugar?"

"Claude does mint chocolate chip has sugar?"

Terrifying to think that even physicists can't code their own simulations anymore. We're plunging headfirst into the dark ages.

The only way it could be worse if it they bought Comcast's data.