— the one side after they fsck the country sideways, every goddamn time.
20 karma · joined June 26, 2026
— the one side after they fsck the country sideways, every goddamn time.
It may be hopeless, but we can still try.
Yeah let's see how this plays out, paying people less than their time is worth for RCEs.
Yes, as we see here.
> regulations to ban gas turbines or whatever doesn't work?
Yes, as we've seen elsewhere.
Anything else you're not clear on?
No it can't. Regulation is already being flouted.
> Banning them outright is the equivalent of banning all immigration
Please be less obvious, this is just insulting.
(Also, most? 80k? What the fsck are you smoking, and who is your dealer?)
Instead of dead. Killed regularly. With survivors knowing that it will happen again, the buildings they put up will come back down, and that is the least of their worries because the buildings can indeed be put back up. Unlike the rest of society Godzilla stomped into ruins.
Godzilla is real. It turns populations into needless wastes and flattens entire communities, cities, countries. We're talking about war. You're countering the desire for peace with "but think of Raytheon's profits."
Have you been paying attention? At all?
The US is really trying to cut off its own legs and branding it as removing unnecessary weight. Give it time, we'll get there.
USGOV disemboweled itself, telling its citizens that they'd be better off without all those gross innards. Womp womp, no do-overs on the global stage, sorry.
Probably! The important part is that your pretend story time supports your base desire to blame the victim!
When this happens to me, I usually solve it by not posting, HTH
Yeah, that sure sounds like paperclip maximizing hypercapitalists. Real big on sharing, not so big on minding the cost, but they just can't show their love for us all while employee labor still has some value to them. Once that's out of the way and they've taken or mulched everything of value from others, that's... that's when they'll start giving it all back, yeah.
I know the sarcasm isn't helpful. But goddamn I can't understand this take, I don't know why people believe people-shaped entities like [your favorite wealthy sociopath's name here] will become society's mommy if given the power, and it's incredibly fscking frustrating. Like people who think once their home and everything is burned to the ground, the fire will rebuild everything, but better.
The data is going to leak so quickly, the first dump will only contain a fresh empty database.
The government's response to Facebook intentionally being toxic and preying on children was to strip rights from its citizens.
Banning social media is not on the table.
An LLM can't convey your ideas and your voice better than you can convey them to the LLM, right? It's a middleman between you and those you want to reach that adds more points of failure, an additional entity that must be understood and made to understand, or else meaning is lost.
EDIT: Never mind the motivations behind a majority of LLM-generated articles, which is to be One Unit Whole Content, a colloid for ads.
If shit gets as bad as people are hoping it will get, workers aren't going to be in the "gets things" class anymore.