Damn, if only some one, some where, at some point, had mentioned that there's no such thing as a secure backdoor to encryption. Oh well, maybe such events are impossible to predict.
1,686 karma · joined March 14, 2022
My experience is only around trying to help a friend get the data off a fried board in a macbook, the desktops might be more standard.
More "tabloids" in April 2021 https://www.tomsguide.com/news/amazon-kindle-update-adds-kil...
More nerds in August 2021, https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/30x1qmxj "the setting that was added a few months ago in Settings/Device Options to show the "Display Cover" of the book you are currently reading"
Amazon discussing rolling it out during ... April 2021, https://www.amazonforum.com/s/question/0D54P00008A1VpoSAF/di...
Maybe you were in a pre-release A/B or region, or simply didn't notice the update.
2021.
People have certainly been asking for it for at least the last decade. Jail breaking doesn't count.
I assume its blocking by origin, not behaviour? Or does that entire website just """break"""?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Truth_of_Fact,_the_Truth_o...
>This seems to work well: the SSB network thrives off of being a group of kind, respectful folks who don't push to each other's master branch. :)
https://github.com/hackergrrl/git-ssb-intro?tab=readme-ov-fi...
Can't imagine that working at any real level of popularity, but maybe that just goes in the "if you have to solve that problem, its a good problem to have" bucket.
$ sudo chown $(whoami): /usr/local/{bin,man,man/man1}
Also booo for using ~/.radicle instead of ~/.config|local|whatever.
Some quirks and bumps, but the software is good at first impression. I really hope something like this can take off. Needs a good (and somehow trustable/authoritative) searchable index though as that's 90% of what most users want from Github I think.
I do wonder if the protocol could be adopted into something like Forgejo to aid adoption of the P2P idea.
I use it and prefer it, much so. Mostly because of rootless (I know docker has made attempts to improve this in the last year or so), not futzing with my iptables and a better handling of pushing images between hosts (it's been over a year since I touched any of that infra, I just remember it being more of hassle with docker which took a "our way or no way" approach).
The biggest issue I have with Podman is the pace of its improvement against the rate of Debian releases!
I agree that ultimately, with wg in the kernel, this is a much simpler setup.
Don't licences normally explicitly bar this? Tough over-sight for Plausible unless there is an actual reason for letting other businesses pretend to be you. Perhaps they figured it would act as a bit of marketing?
Erlang/OTP 27 [erts-15.0] [source] [64-bit] [smp:4:4] [ds:4:4:10] [async-threads:1] [jit:ns]
Interactive Elixir (1.17.1) - press Ctrl+C to exit (type h() ENTER for help)
iex(1)> defmodule X, do: defstruct [:a]
{:module, X,
<<70, 79, 82, 49, 0, 0, 7, 128, 66, 69, 65, 77, 65, 116, 85, 56, 0, 0, 0, 244,
0, 0, 0, 22, 8, 69, 108, 105, 120, 105, 114, 46, 88, 8, 95, 95, 105, 110,
102, 111, 95, 95, 10, 97, 116, 116, 114, ...>>, %X{a: nil}}
iex(2)> x = %X{a: 1}
%X{a: 1}
iex(3)> x[:a]
** (UndefinedFunctionError) function X.fetch/2 is undefined (X does not implement the Access behaviour
You can use the "struct.field" syntax to access struct fields. You can also use Access.key!/1 to access struct fields dynamically inside get_in/put_in/update_in)
X.fetch(%X{a: 1}, :a)
(elixir 1.17.1) lib/access.ex:322: Access.get/3
iex:7: (file)
iex(4)> get_in(x, [:a])
** (UndefinedFunctionError) function X.fetch/2 is undefined (X does not implement the Access behaviour
You can use the "struct.field" syntax to access struct fields. You can also use Access.key!/1 to access struct fields dynamically inside get_in/put_in/update_in)
X.fetch(%X{a: 1}, :a)
(elixir 1.17.1) lib/access.ex:322: Access.get/3
iex:7: (file)
iex(5)> get_in(x, [Access.key!(:a)])
1https://i.imgur.com/S7d4ZXg.png