420 karma · joined June 17, 2016
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/david-graeber-and-ja...
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UOpsfRLRr_I/VbhWuR4OeBI/AAAAAAAAB...
https://live.staticflickr.com/3800/33033871090_f658526696_b....
The art and architecture around the lab has a surprisingly rich history dating back to its first director who was also a sculptor/artist: https://history.fnal.gov/historical/art_arch/art_architectur...
For me it's still Thief (or Heat) but MV is very close
> Yes. We are [studying] this, but I think the jury is still out. We're certainly very interested in addressing that publicly as soon as we can.
there are a comically high number of jobs at "prestigious" companies where this is absolutely not true
when i see "at their wits' end" i take that to mean "we've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas"
> People occasionally conflate these shell-company reverse mergers with the current boom in special purpose acquisition companies, but they are really very different. A SPAC goes public and raises money specifically for the purpose of taking a private company public; it sells shares to the public and then has a public vote with a lot of disclosure to complete its merger. A reverse merger generally involves a public shell of a more or less defunct operating company (or at least one that pretended to have operations); the shell will be fairly closely held by a few insiders, and there will be no real money inside it. It is not a high-profile way to go public and raise money, the way a SPAC is; it’s a low-profile way to sneak into the public markets.
very scientific, thank you Hacker News