This seems more like a marketing stunt than anything else. They previously "banned vibecoded projects".
1,268 karma · joined October 3, 2007
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/biznickman; my proof: https://keybase.io/biznickman/sigs/qx9VgTjavJo1qeeE7e-2mIb09WHf4h8ro-mTvOU-UEM ]
This seems more like a marketing stunt than anything else. They previously "banned vibecoded projects".
They didn't acquire Moltbook because of the software. Meta is far behind on the AI front especially as it applies to usage adoption. OpenClaw has begun showing new consumer use cases and Moltbook is directionally down a similar path.
They get the team that built it and have more people on the AI initiative who are consumer-centric.
I've watched Matt Schlicht from the team always experiment with cool new use cases of AI and other technologies and now him and Ben have a bigger lab with resources to potentially spawn out larger initiatives.
The lesson here is to spend less time focused on doing what you think is the right thing and spend more time tinkering.
Making it easy for engineers, experienced OR aspiring is huge.
Instead communication skills and a willingness to learn have been much bigger indicators. There are plenty of startups that will LOVE to have you. Focus on getting a job at earlier stage startups. Create your own projects as well. People like seeing those projects to show that you're passionate about coding.
Yes, there are shitcoins but there are real things being built as well.
I’ve written thousands of blog posts and happy to point you in the right direction!
Also, as a side note, it would be interesting if you had an LTSE index fund!
I don't know where the joke is from but if there is one about how engineers set up a blog it would go like this.
Normal person:
Goes to Medium, Wordpress, or somewhere else, starts writing and clicks publish.
Developer:
1. Set up ReactJS for the front end
2. Set up a build system for automated deployments
3. Sets up MongoDB to store the articles they'll be writing
4. Sets up the backend to serve up the various articles
5. Builds an integration for Wordpress that enables Wordpress to pull and push (make sure both ways) to the MongoDB system that's storing the newsletters
6. Sets up all the integrations required for SEO
7. Sets up the integration testing framework
8. Write an article
9. Clicks publish
Facebook's PR has been troubled for a very long time. To suggest that they has a stellar image before 2019 is a joke. I can list many other slip ups where Facebook could have come out and said something (or even better, did something) and then weeks later they come up with a weak statement. If that's great PR, I'd like to offer my services to anybody who needs it.
While I'd agree that "No one ever broke rank. The messaging was crystal clear.", the message was always an awful one and now they have a relatively negative reputation despite being a remarkable success.
The rise of foreign money parking money in real estate has screwed things up on a global level. San Francisco has felt the brunt of this due to their insanely restrictive development laws.
Frankly, for the 7+ years I was in San Francisco I was always saying they should pass laws to prevent foreign investment in real estate or at a minimum require people live there for X% of the year.
Ultimately we are all dependent on the functionality of the internet and making a physical copy is the best way to make something last. However if we intend to not only have it last but be accessible, some of the suggestions are helpful but the most significant is: where can I host something indefinitely?
Will Netlify, Github Pages, AWS, etc all be around in 50 years? 100 years? 500 years? Heck, the internet hasn't even been around for all that long.
As I write this, my only thought is that you need a system of fallbacks. Frankly, this seems like a business opportunity in which the cost of the infrastructure is purchased based on some formula. DNS is configured programmatically. File locations are distributed and redundant. I'm not sure what the best approach is but one thing is certain: the page accessibility is the least of this author's issues. He just needs the site to be hosted...
alignCenter :: [String] -> [String]
alignCenter xs = map (\x -> replicate (div (n - length x) 2) ' ' ++ x) xs
where n = maximum (map length xs)
One of the most verbose languages I've used, Objective C, has made this a best practice. Despite the brackets (which scare people off), it can be some of the easiest to read code.If you package yourself properly (for example, "I help founders take their startup idea from dream to reality"), you have now placed yourself in a new, more valuable, bucket. You have to hunt for the proper client fit but your offering is of greater value (in this circumstance you make dreams a reality).
Granted, entrepreneurs aren't the best market but the key is having some differentiator in your market and not offering a commodity service (which is what Wix, Squarespace, and frankly "web development" is).
Frankly, this is not a new issue. It's just the effort by Google to use publisher content & data for their own profit continues to expand.
I always end up going to Wirecutter and their related sites for product reviews as they are the modern Consumer Reports. In those circumstances, the affiliate link will still function as anticipated.
The problem is that environmental driven campaigns have been incredibly ineffective. Perhaps it's our responsibility to generate noise the same level of that with Net Neutrality?
However on smaller projects I've found that just clicking through to make sure things work and then letting my error reporting system catch bugs to be much more effective :)
It's a hard line to walk and I surely haven't perfected it. I'll give it a shot on a future project!
Soon after Apple's acquisition they (1) jacked up the price, and then (2) shut it down soon after.
The reality is that Twitter doesn't have the resources allocated to manage tiny customers and doesn't desire to. That decision was made years ago. They can give an employee 10 customers to manage each of whom spend $36,000 a year and likely will increase and the math adds up.
Is anybody really shocked by this pricing?
Providing transparency to the marketers enables them to provide better targeting, more efficient spend, and in turn provide a better experience for their customers.
One other note pertaining to agencies. They'll continue to exist but the world where they can just blindly spend money is coming to an end. Previously they'd have a random ad buyer in the agency just go and spend the money. Those days are coming to an end and the free margin is going to instead go to reward those agencies that more effectively manage spend.
More transparency --> More insights --> More efficient spend --> Better overall experience.