I haven't used it, but there is a tortoisegit project: http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/
Anyone know the status of EGit? I can't download source or binaries; it looks like the server has been down for a couple weeks. http://www.eclipse.org/egit/
1,182 karma · joined November 22, 2008
I haven't used it, but there is a tortoisegit project: http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/
Anyone know the status of EGit? I can't download source or binaries; it looks like the server has been down for a couple weeks. http://www.eclipse.org/egit/
But to answer the question:
virgin: water
ethyl alcohol: ...I guess whiskey (bourbon or irish). Maybe a nice red wine [Not $2 Chuck]
caffeine: coffee
I had that experience at an interview. Among other things, the interviewer was late, I was stuck in a tiny office with three people interviewing me, etc, etc. It was quickly apparent to me that they didn't respect their programmers. I decided half way through the interview that I had no interest in the job, and considered politely departing right then, but I stuck it out. I figured it was good interview practice.
On a team with more experienced developers, I'd probably have you working with parts of our test suite and the build system. Of course, you'd have to understand object orientation, which I can't assume from your description.
1. Our teeth evolved to chew plants and veggies, true. As omnivores, we have to eat plants, not just meat. Plants are more difficult to digest, so most of our teeth resemble herbivores' teeth (chewing is the first step in digestion). Notice that we also chew meat just fine. I don't know anyone who can't chew meat because their teeth are too flat. We can even rip it right off the bone with certain teeth. Is that not an evolutionary adaptation?
My point is that just because we chew plants relatively well, that does not mean we also don't chew meat well.
2. Cooked foods kill the nutrients
Since I'm addressing the herbivore vs. omnivore argument, I'll ignore this one, as it obviously applies to plants and not meat.
3. Our digestive tract is long, apparently to process plant[s]...
Similar to #1. A long digestive tract may be necessary to process plants, but it does not preclude digesting meat.
4. Animal meat is the only food that gives us colesterol [sic].
.... which is okay in moderation. People can't survive on fruits alone, either. That doesn't mean that fruit should be eliminated from our diet.
Really? My AP Calc class was not very proof-focus (probably because the AP Calc test was not), but 10th grade (~15-16 y.o.) Geometry was mostly just proofs. As was Trigonometry. This was 10 years ago, but those same teachers are still at my old school. Presumably they teach the same material. I guess this is atypical? That's too bad, because those trig proofs were actually kinda fun.
You can look at their charts here: http://bit.ly/ar6Kxm
It's the same as with the phone booth. The same technology that lets the guy send a fax from the beach allows him to make calls from almost anywhere, (even video conferencing if you have an Evo or similar phone) pushing the phone booth out of common use. And, when everyone has a computer with an internet connection, why would someone have to go to a cash machine to buy concert tickets?
It is almost impossible to get everything right, and if there are certain key technologies that aren't predicted correctly (like desktop computers, high-bandwidth cell signals, internet everywhere, etc), then it has a cascading effect of invalidating many of the other predictions.
"[the language] will be more like a declarative description of the facts about a goal and the means available for attaining it than a program per se."
It sounds like he's talking about Prolog.
Error correction is a property of some, but not all, DNA polymerases. This process corrects mistakes in newly-synthesized DNA. When an incorrect base pair is recognized, DNA polymerase reverses its direction by one base pair of DNA. The 3'-5' exonuclease activity of the enzyme allows the incorrect base pair to be excised (this activity is known as proofreading). Following base excision, the polymerase can re-insert the correct base and replication can continue.
A great deal of terrible, buggy, unmaintainable software has been written due to exactly this type of sentiment. I have maintained, re-written, built on top of this type of software. The correct way to build power grid software (or any science/engineering-related software) is by having very smart software engineers (who do understand or can quickly figure out things like recursion), working closely with electrical engineers (or biologists/chemical engineers/etc). As in, they should be in constant (at least weekly) contact with each other. The software engineers learn about electricity, and the electrical engineers learn a little about software architecture.
This is based on my experience developing software for engineering applications. I currently work on software in the Aerospace industry, and I communicate regularly with other engineers. My software team is full of brilliant software engineers. Smart people can learn about other fields on-the-job. If you accidentally hire one that can't, don't fret: there is always work that doesn't require an intimate knowledge of electronics, such as build scripts, support software, utilities, etc.
That being said, I do think there is a place for a software engineer with a passion for other types of engineering. My degree is in Bioengineering, but my greatest experience (and greatest interest) is in software engineering. So, while I grok differential equations, control systems, and metabolism, I also understand recursion and polymorphism. And deterministic finite automaton. And closures. And I'm not the only one.
My point is this: If you have a really hard engineering problem that requires really smart software, hire really smart programmers, really smart engineers, and a couple really smart people who understand both sides. Like me!
You can, however, request deletion of your genetic data by providing us with written notice to help@23andme.com. We will delete your genetic data from our records within 30 days of receipt of such notice.
All of my attempts since had no effect. Granted, I haven't tried to bump that many times.
My theory is that they use a GPS location to determine where you are. Then when the phone senses a particular type of motion, it considers that a "bump". The server looks to see if anyone else is "bumping" in that GPS location, and, if so, they connect and exchange contact info or whatever.
If this is true, it explains my original success with bumping into strangers: these two people were probably in a nearby house trying to bump! The server thought they were close to my GPS location, and connected me to the stranger.
At the time, I wondered, "if they didn't learn how to write an essay in high school, what did they learn?" I never really found out.
This is a perfectly valid response if this was LTU or comp.compilers, but here on hacker news only a small percentage of us are actually in a position to "fix our language implementation".
Know your audience! If you are talking to language users (not makers), this comment just... well,
>> made yourself look like an ass.
The front page has an embedded command prompt. You can navigate the comics by typing "prev" and "next". It also supports some unix commands.
According to "license.txt":
Client-side logic for Wordpress CLI theme :: R. McFarland, 2006, 2007, 2008
jQuery rewrite and overhaul :: Chromakode, 2010