It had nothing to do with "if I take a screenshot of your app at any moment, it must make sense." As others here have pointed out - this entire article is very poorly conceived.
2,735 karma · joined February 3, 2010
It had nothing to do with "if I take a screenshot of your app at any moment, it must make sense." As others here have pointed out - this entire article is very poorly conceived.
https://www.carsales.com.au/editorial/details/wheels-falling...
Please imagine a ladder with steps numbered from 0 at the bottom to 10 at the top. The top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom of the ladder represents the worst possible life for you. On which step of the ladder would you say you personally feel you stand at this time?
You have done a brilliant job elevating your chosen specialty to the world, and encouraging and inspiring others in the industry for a long time - so you should be fairly compensated for that lofty position. I don't envy the late nights or very early mornings you have ahead of you on conference calls with SF, but good luck at OpenAI mate !
1. In the part of the trial in which you can actually compare raw death counts because of the randomization, the deaths were 15-14, with confidence intervals nearly completely overlapping, and so there was no evidence vaccine arm death rates were significantly higher than placebo arm.
2. After the subjects were unblinded, the placebo subjects were allowed to crossover to the vaccine arm, and the vast majority did, with >>90% of the subjects vaccinated in the end and <<10% remaining vaccinated. After crossover, there were 9 additional deaths, 6 of who had been vaccinated and 3 of which had not yet been vaccinated.
3. But one cannot simply add the 6 to the 15 and 3 to the 14 and compare 21 vs. 17 to compare death rate of vaccinated to unvaccinated, since after the crossover, the vast majority were vaccinated and very few remained unvaccinated.
4. If one wants to assess the death rate after vaccination during the post-crossover period, they must treat it as an observational cohort study with time-varying vaccination status, adjusting for the wildly different group sizes and the fact that there were far more person-years of potential risk of death (i.e. denomiantors for death rates) after vaccination than in the pre-vaccination group. If such an analysis is done, there is also no evidence that death rate after vaccination is greater than before vaccination.
So, in the end, there is no evidence that the death rate in the vaccinated group is greater than the placebo/unvaccinated group.
Then her second big error is presuming, without any evidence whatsoever, that the excess deaths in Australia are predominately caused by the vaccine.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2025/11/googles-new-weather-...
He has the ability to explain concepts and thoughts with analogies and generalizations and interesting sayings that allow you to keep interest in what he is talking about for literally hours - in a subject that I don't know that much about. Clearly he is very smart, as is the interviewer, but he is also a fantastic communicator and does not come across as arrogant or pretentious, but really just helpful and friendly. Its quite a remarkable and amazing skillset. I'm in awe.
Notion seems have a lot of hype lately, and Microsoft tries to be king of the hill when it comes to productivity apps, buying tools encroaching upon their turf of Outlook and Excel (6 Wunderkinder, Yammer, Ally.io) or competing vigorously if they cant buy them (Teams). Seems like this Notion v3 could tip it over the edge into full blown productivity powerhouse.
Its these professional PM's that have done nothing else other than project mangement or PMP that don't have an understanding of the long term dev. cost of features that cause these systemic issues.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/11/world/asia/air-india-cras...