biglenny

I use uBlock Origin. No ads, ever. And you get access to all the music uploaded to YouTube.

$0.00/month

You seem to have a unique perspective based on your comment history. Could you explain why or why not you see F/G as monopolistic forces? I have no opinion on the matter, but I'm trying to understand.

Ignorant? It's a well known fact that European tech salaries (especially SWE salaries) are dwarfed by American/SV salaries. Just look up the difference in what GOOGLE pays its American vs EU employees. This doesn't even take into account taxation rate, which is favorable in US.

Virtually every "How much do you earn?" thread that pops up on HN has loads of comments with Europeans being surprised at the amount of money Americans make in tech.

Further - right now America is close to uncontested in the amount of technology it is producing and exporting. The only widely used European software I can think of is SAP. America is winning the talent war. I've only had a few friends who moved from US to Europe for tech work - and in all cases it had nothing to do with the job. Had more to do with wanting to "explore new places". On the other hand, I know tonnes of Euros, Indians, and Chinese who have come to US to work.

>First, mining uranium is not exactly environmentally friendly and those involved in the mining process are at a considerably higher risk of lung and non-lung cancers.

Hey buddy, the mining isn't much cleaner for the lithium, the cobalt, the REEs, the copper, or really anything required for PVs or the batteries which store their energy. And at least most of the uranium supply is in developed countries.

This seems off-topic, more political than an interesting new phenomenon.

More like:

1) to reduce dependency on foreign oil

2) to reduce local pollution

3) to establish global dominance in batteries and vehicles.

-----POWERGAP-----

4) to counter global climate change

curious, how would this prevent being captured on camera? isn't visible light used?

I'd bet the majority of the money was spent on recruiting the e-celebs to the platform.

Seems like a fad to me. I wonder if/when Instagram will replicate the lip-syncing feature. I personally am not attracted to the app at all and find the videos pretty toe-curling. But I'm curious to see how far it goes.

Another thought - TikTok seems to be really popular with young teens. I wonder if Douyin (the version for China) appeals to the same age demographic and if users are doing more with the app than the lip-sync

Anyone who wears "AirPods" is a massive cookie cutter. I lose respect for people the instant I see those things in their ears

Is it just me or does 17k/student/yr for tuition, books, food, and accommodations not seem unreasonable

>But our carbon emmisions are still climbing while most of the europe that we should be comparing ourselves to has either stopped or reduced their emmisions. We are still not contributing to a carbon negative world other than not being as bad as we could have been.

What now? Your emissions have remained flat for the last ten years, you have a carbon tax, your country was one of the first to implement CCS technology [1]. You guys have by no means been sitting on your hands.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_Norway

Mineral processing is one of the most resource intensive processes known to man. The amount of water and equipment required for communition alone is nuts, and facilitating that process, along with many others, in space will remain infeasible for close to a century - at least. Never mind the transportation of the asteroids, or the post ore-sorting manufacturing that would supposedly take place in space.

I'm sure they got acquired for cents on the dollar. Stupid, far-fetched idea. Asteroid mining will always be a pop-sci topic. Most asteroids appear to be composed of base metals which we have no trouble finding on Earth.

I don't know why you insist on a choice being "hard". What matters is the outcome. Taking billions of dollars out of foreign FF stocks has a good outcome for the environment and leads the way for even more to be taken out. The economy is unaffected. Government gets their petrorevenues to spend on reducing the country's emissions.

Stopping drilling just means another producer fills the void, and the Norwegian economy suffers as a result. People rightfully react to that and often elect someone on the other end of the political spectrum. Not only do other producers have less env. regulation, but the backlash from the Norwegian populace could elect a government within Norway who slashes this regulation and restarts production. History is replete with reactionary governments, especially when the Overton window is shifted too fast.

My point is, keep diversifying the economy, keep diversifying energy sources. Just because drilling continues does not mean alternative energy is slowing down. Take it slow, else you risk backlash.

What? I'm in the industry and believe me, Norway is making transitions. Statoil -> Equinor. Your SWF no longer will invest in fossil fuels. Wayyy more mandates regarding emissions/pollution during extraction.

They shouldn't just stop drilling. It is a moneymaker for the country and gives the government lots of money to spend on policies which reduce the country's emissions. Norway produces lots of oil relative to the country's size so if they took it off the market, it would just come from somewhere with less standards and less commitment to the environment. They should make calculated moves which don't risk the country's economic future. Taking the biggest sovereign wealth fund in the world's money out of FF stocks is a good way to start, and doesn't jeopardize much, if anything.

Green's only purpose should be to change the dialogue, not to be given any legislative power whatsoever. They will make drastic moves which will yield economic consequences felt by the public. Reality is, people have to be in good economic circumstances to care about altruistic goals like curtailing climate change. Take those good economic circumstances away from them - and suddenly the environment is no longer much of a priority.

>Iraq and other countries purchases millions of dollars worth of phony bomb detectors. Something anyone with a bit of science education can debunk.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/06/fake-bomb-detectors-...

This is a hilarious read.

I am low IQ. Please give me a hint

I was going to say that this is a very stupid thing to post, not only because of the content, but because it would ruin your career.

Then I wondered why an archive.org link was posted. Then I found this:

https://github.com/AviAgarwal/AccountHacked

Don't really know what is going on here.

Area under the curve.

I though you were talking about the legalization of MJ, not specifically Medical MJ. Looking at the parent, you specified medical MJ, so I misinterpreted. Apologies on my end.

You don't understand what you are talking about.

EKC works with pollutants that have short term, acute consequences. Think sulfates, nitrates, carbon monoxide, etc.

EKC has not been proven true with pollutants whose effects are less concentrated and whose effects take longer to realize (CH4, CO2, etc). The catastrophes I'm referring to have little to do with the paper you cited.

>How callous and sheltered do you have to be to say something like that?

Keep the dialogue civil.

It turns out that industrializing a society creates a lot of pollution. That pollution, as we've recently found out, is responsible for "the massive humanitarian crises and greater suffering" we are going to experience as impoverished nations continue to industrialize (ie. get lifted out of poverty).

See: IPCC

Most of what you said is relevant and correct, but:

>Medical Marijuana is becoming legal in just about every state in the USA.

Feel like this was just thrown in there. I don't see how wasting millions of gallons of water on a useless plant is representative of the human population taking sacrifices to luxuries in order to prolong the life of the planet. In fact - it sounds like quite the opposite.

>AR & VR will hopefully decrease travel

"Hey boss can I take a week off next month for travel?"

"Sure bud where ya going?"

"google.com/images" - said nobody... ever.

100%. Having a "passion" for politics was abrasive to my relationships with friends throughout high-school and returned very little value to me (save the short-lived energy I got from stupid internet debates).

> Even if you ignore that, desk jockeys aren't all sedentary losers

You're right. You used the word "loserS"

Yeah sry if I came off aggressive man. Everyone in this thread misinterpreting what I said probably reflects more on ME than them. I need to get better at writing...

Dude, how did you get "right-wingers are losers and there are none at Google" from "low-test is an insult used by ALT-right losers"? I wasn't talking about political leaning of Google employees at all.

I seriously gotta get better with my words lol. Everyone in this thread seems to be getting a different meaning out of what I said.

Yeah, I know some. I said "tendency" for a reason. People in this thread seem to think I said "every and without exception".

You are the only one who has associated a sedentary job with being a loser or a blue class job with high testosterone. I'd appreciate if you didn't put words in my mouth.

You seem to be misconstruing a "tendency" for an "absolute blanket on all"