bibbitybobbity

This article has an exploitative undertone in the hiring process.

The “what will you do to work here vibe” might work for inexperienced fresh grads but is something others will avoid like the plague. It seems like there no employee leverage at scale.

We shouldn't forget about google. It also needs to be regulated.

This is addressed in the article but the title doesn't reflect this accurately.

TLDR; Clickbait title :sad face:

Pointing out that this happens specifically when companies maximizes for prioritizes profit instead of the benefit of their product (which was what allowed them to gain such traction).

It does feel prevalent in large corporations though.

War is not a great comparison to running a business. It's definitely not a great premise for enabling what seems like a hostile work environment.

I don't think privacy works when I don't trust Apple period. They have done shady anti consumer things like decreasing battery life. This feels like lip service till I see implementation details(and even then I want to see the code).

Your website isn't secured with a certificate, FYI

Deleted, what garbage

Sounds like image steganography. If anyone wants a python example here ya go https://github.com/jermainezhimin/culpriteCTF/blob/master/LS...

Welcome to timeshare, reinvented

I've personally experienced the "effective pause" and strongly feel against it. This assumes that software engineers always have ideas on how to fix things and are not autonomous.

In my opinion, it's helps much more to break down/simplify the engineer's thought and the problem they are trying to solve. And then, try to solve it together...