bharxhav

It'll be funny when AI will embody human philosophy better than us.

You are an LLM dataset's worst nightmare. XD

Rust is about abstractions more than code. You can ask AI to "Optimize/Test/Clarify" but at the end of the day you should be willing to blindly agree to it's output or spend more time reviewing someone else's code.

Didn't Vercel ship something like this last year?

https://github.com/vercel-labs/json-render

I feel it's far simpler if you optimize for:

<product> <product> <lead competitor> <competitor product> <competitor product> (<year>)

This is very generous. The agent sdk and -p were abused by other devs and "startups." They tried to block them, and we had the Hermes gate disaster. This is a very clean and low maintenance way to own their moat back.

Anthropic is selling subsidized products and not a subsidized AI, and they have all rights to.

Many of us did fall for it. The dopamine hit we get from working hard and shipping a PR is now "automated." This is like tiktok for devs.

This canary will never leave the mine. (unless Anthropic opens their wallet again)

"agents"

Damn, they keep brainwashing people into thinking LLMs are intelligent, meanwhile they be translating into somewhat coherent words and fool the world.

When they're right, they polish their intelligence badge. When they're wrong, we prompted incorrectly.

Would be interesting to see if this correlated with their release cycles.

Ramanujan is a good analogy for this situation. Theories could be right/wrong, until there's a proof. Same with anything AI produces. There's always a "told you so" baked in with it's response.