bgvopg

You are making a logical fallacy of sorts. He wasn't destined for this role, he just happened, by skill and luck, to make it out of the 7 Billion people who didn't. If he was alone he wouldn't succeed.

If Apple doesn't make an map-app that tells you which way to turn by vibrating selectively left-right on the watch then they don't deserve to succeed.

That would actually explain a lot of his comments.

I prefer to learn, rather than stay ignorant, when I find new tech.

The only people I would not want to work with are ignoramuses and ironically, smart-asses. So you.

I hope this thread gave you some idea how important these thing really are.

Hey it works!, great now I have an alternative to Wireshark.

My reply to kdoherty isn't assuming that. Read the parent carefully.

Some would twitch at this:

for(i = length - 1; i < SIZE_MAX ; i--)

but it is completely valid.

Surprisingly accurate, author did his research.

5 is also missing a check for a NULL pointer. ;)

Most of there rules are unfortunately ignored, as obscure information. The worst offender I see in wild code is 5.

The second most ignored is not checking values before computation: 10, 11, 12.

No.7 is very interesting, rarely violated, most programmers don't even know that is a thing or just assume the processor won't trap on an unaligned read.

What is your main programming language; in which you do most of the work?