bestwillcui

Thanks! Yea the watch button should do that, we added 14.01 before that feature but will fix asap.

And yea probably thinking to do a guiding mode (as you said, often better to have the tutor guide you through step-by-step instead of giving you the answer right away) and a straightforward answer mode for the tutor. Or if you have any other ideas.

Yea he's awesome! We just launched another official course with him yesterday haha (https://miyagilabs.ai/course/taxonomy-and-plant-id)

It's currently run on gpt-4o with some prompting guardrails, but I wouldn't trust it completely for younger (elementary school age) children.

Most of our courses are built for a slightly older age range, but we'd consider rolling out more beginner courses that are geared towards younger children and have more safety tests. If you have any thoughts let us know!

Thanks! We'd love to chat if you have any ideas or want to share your experience, we think Coursera is great. And yea totally understand the blue chip edtech thing, we're pretty excited to be a startup in this space.

Great points. Definitely will improve the section lectures on the left, some formatting stuff to think about with the bottom section/transcript as well.

Not completely sure about the AI tutor points though. I don't think the standard AI chat interface is the ideal form factor for the average person trying to learn something, and there's value in having pre-generated content that users can see instead of having to actively go to the tutor.

Also, a lot of people do like using flashcards specifically to learn! Granted, our current implementation is pretty barebones so it's not super useful yet. And definitely agree that things can be cleaned up quite a bit.

For now we only use the YouTube transcript because for most educational content we've found it does about as well for lower cost.

We may make that an option though, since we also offer other resource types (pdf, slides, docs) -> course.

We'll reach out and hopefully add some courses! Thanks.

I don't think that's true? We're embedding the videos, which is allowed.

Also to be clear we have partnerships for all the featured courses. This refers to if a user creates a course based on some videos.

Lol yea not just poaching, we do revenue sharing (signed deals with a bunch of top creators). They get the majority of all revenue from courses.

For instance we worked directly with Crime Pays but Botany Doesn't & Faculty of Khan etc. to get official courses that they also had input in, and 3Blue1Brown is on board with us having his content on our site.

At this stage it seems like a good metric since it's the creator's content. We're adding a feature for question feedback from users, so they can like/dislike/report questions, but very open to other metrics if you have any ideas.

Yep—also in the process of adding learning paths for certain subjects, so you can go from an introductory course to more advanced topics and fill in gaps in understanding. Agreed: our mission is to help students actually learn in the best way possible, we have individual courses now to start out but the goal is to integrate the learning experience.

Very curious to chat about what you guys do, and if you have recs for any literature in the space that we should look at.

Yes for the first, technically yes for the second? The user can go in and change the content as well (i.e. if it's a teacher generating a course for students). But not sure what other human supervision + quality control methods you're referring to that we could implement.

Thanks! We do have multiple choice questions now (agreed) but some of the older courses were generated when there were only short answer.

Anything specific we could improve about talking to the tutor? Definitely will add some of those features and gamify better.

Sorry we're running into some rate limits with course generation but will be fixed soon. Valid points—will respond in a bit.

Yep, if anyone didn't want their videos to be on our site, we would take it down.

Just watched the video, I don't initially agree with his take completely but do totally respect the viewpoint and think a payment split to the creator whenever someone summarizes the video makes sense.

Yes we do offer the option to summarize content without creator buy-in, although it seems a bit different since we're also augmenting the content with questions etc. which should drive users to watch the video even more as opposed to skip it and just read the summary.

But you're right it's not perfect. If we ever have creators who don't want their stuff on our site we'd totally respect their wishes, but that hasn't been the case right now so this seems like the best thing to do.

Thanks, we'll reach out. We have a poker course from MIT (https://miyagilabs.ai/course/mit15s50) but yea these seem more practical & engaging.

Thanks! Definitely some potential, we actually built a language learning tool for a few days early on (but decided that it was too crowded of a space to start in).

Learning languages seems a bit different in that there's more focus on repetition compared to comprehension questions, but there are certain topics (like grammar concepts) that could work well in our current structure. Also there are some really popular YouTube channels for learning any language, so we definitely see a potential to augment those videos to more accurately & effectively learn.

For official courses, we go over the generated course with the creator to vet the content. Generally they're pretty impressed but have a few things they'd like to change/add before publishing.

For self-created courses, it's generally been quite accurate and we're playing around with some eval metrics to make it as good as possible, but it's definitely a concern.