https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastWeek&page=0&prefix=fal...
5,318 karma · joined November 19, 2013
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastWeek&page=0&prefix=fal...
Since v91 or so.
2. You removed "Old versions" from the headline for clickbait.
> The new PayPal log in option will first be available to iPhone, iPad, or Mac users on PayPal.com and will expand to additional platforms as those platforms add support for passkeys.
>Once existing customers log in to PayPal with a browser on desktop or mobile web using their existing PayPal credentials such as a username and password, they will have the option to "Create a passkey." Customers will then be prompted to authenticate with Apple Face ID or Touch ID. Then the passkey will be automatically created, and next time PayPal customers log in, they won't need to use or manage a password again.
>If they have devices that don't support passkeys yet, users can still use an iPhone to log in with a PayPal passkey. Users simply scan the QR code that will appear after they enter their PayPal User ID.
Rollout in the US today, other countries early in 2023.
https://github.com/GitJournal/GitJournal
Recent HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31914003
Looks like it:
https://github.com/e-dant/watcher/blob/989147b183ee0547d71a1...
I'd like to express myself and say that I just want a secure and privacy-respecting browser that gets its priorities straight.
But wouldn't you agree that the article is mainly about why "Web 3.0" has failed over and over again to provide exactly these properties, or to provide a valuable solution to a problem that hasn't been or could be solved in a better way already?
Literally everything related to "Web 3.0" has been a snowbally scam, and yet, as another commenter in this thread put it aptly, "the "pull back" in hype has allowed a new breed of charlatans to pretend there is ever more legitimacy to this whole scam".
It is, for me at least, impossible to take DAI stablecoins, AAVE positions or any other new kid on the block seriously.
I'm sorry, I know this isn't reddit, but: fucking lol.
What do you even mean? What does "owning value on the internet" mean? This is exactly the kind of handwaving the article is about.
You say this, and yet fail to mention a legitimate use case, which is exactly what a big part of the article is about.
Hm, I wonder why that is.
By default, 'Basic' mode is selected because it does not require the permission to read and change data.
If you trust uBO Lite, you can give it broad permission to read and change data on all websites in order to enable more advanced filtering capabilities for all websites by default."
Regarding the need for a mobile device: I guess it technically wouldn't need to be a mobile phone, but that is the easiest way to get biometric authentication and a secure enclave. This is how passkeys work. Don't like it, don't use it. It will probably take quite some time before services offer passkeys as their only authentication mechanism.
edit: source code is here https://gitdab.com/cadence/breezewiki
0: https://github.com/android-password-store/kage
1: https://github.com/android-password-store/Android-Password-S...
Really? Sure, reading the whitepapers and playing with something new for a while has been fun, but "true engineers" will realize pretty soon that there's always a better tool for every. single. usecase.
This is a nice example imho.