Given what it was in the very beginning versus what it very rapidly grew into, I guess it was just something that made sense at the time.
237 karma · joined May 20, 2010
Given what it was in the very beginning versus what it very rapidly grew into, I guess it was just something that made sense at the time.
I would like to see more storage though in its various forms; the oversupply is during peak daytime hours, however there's still large draw at night that could be offset.
SQLite is single writer, so transaction isolation is easy, writes are linear by their very nature.
Cockroach does some really funky stuff, but its serialization guarantees are only within certain conditions. Traditionally it has also had low write throughput compared to other systems, mainly due to its distributed nature. Jepsen touches on that here https://jepsen.io/analyses/cockroachdb-beta-20160829 though things have vastly improved since then.
To your earlier point, it may not even matter depending on the workload, or if you're aware of your database limitations. In cases where it does matter then being aware of the limitations of something like Repeatable Read makes the trade-off worth it.
Which entry is picked for use is generally random depending on the client.
Most systems will retry using another entry though on issues connecting through. That said, if you are on a network that is 192.168 based, trying to get to Microsoft.com may just send you to your local router!
Having dedicated network appliances acting as firewalls means from a security perspective you need to compromise the local machine and then also compromise a dedicated, hardened external system as well. It vastly ups the difficulty barrier.
In reality there is no great way to avoid it for services that have SMS as a fall back measure. Some phone companies allow a lock on transferring your SIM, requiring you to physically enter one of their stores in order to unlock, but that's about it.
That situation is tough though as you're working through both ego and office politics.
Card definitely has his own style with his work. Whether it's great or not is dependant on the reader - http://one-starreviews.tumblr.com/ gives some fantastic examples.
If you can, try the Seventh Son series though. easier read than Speaker or Xenocide, and very interesting IMO.
It does seem rather radical to switch off a massive amount of genes and switch on a bunch of others in adulthood, drastically changing your physical form.
Finding further information about it: looks like a core switch died with the backup not kicking in. 12 hours to work around is a but much though.
Given the time frame of when it happened it's more likely a change that has been borked in some way with difficulties in rolling back.
Pragmatically, there's little downside to publishing it as well - if people eat healthier and exercise a little more as a result, brilliant. For researchers given the wide base of ground to cover in the disease, if it gives more funding in their fields, also brilliant.
Taking a step back and looking at Alzheimer's just as a metabolic disease (which does have some merit, let me find the papers) does give some new avenues to explore. Same as you will be interested to see what comes out of it. It truly is a crushing disease for all involved.
It is annoying though, a little bit of jQuery would fix it in about 5 seconds flat.
When you come across pieces of code that may seem esoteric, doing a "rubber ducky" debug (talk through the code line by line with ann inanimate object) on it I find helps tremendously with both understanding what's going on along with the author's mental approach to the problem.
In the event they may just not be a great programmer you can still learning something from the way they approached the challenge.
In almost every country the materials required are tightly regulated and getting permission even in a lab environment is tough work. If you can work out the legalities and safety, I'd be interested too!
On that note, the idea you're talking about was actually considered for a little while for public use until the dangers were found to outweigh the benefits.
Considering how much money they have spent to be a sponsor I don't think they count their return to happen during the Olympic period, this looks more to be a habit forming thing (when you go out their aim is you'll go for your Visa by default).