59 karma · joined May 17, 2017
Edit: just looked it up but see also Rob's new project TinySeed.com: The First Startup Accelerator Designed for Bootstrappers.
see last paragraph: https://themortgagereports.com/39665/cash-to-close-what-is-i...
Decoding the Universe: How the New Science of Information Is Explaining Everything in the Cosmos, from Our Brains to Black Holes, by Charles Seife
One item discussed in the book that we as humans may just be a transport method for the data within DNA to survive time. Because without some replication it would get trapped and cease to exist.
Tail gearbox failure https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11TD0Dboixo
ground resonance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FeXjhUEXlc
lightening strike https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uybTDikWzWs
https://gist.github.com/ndarville/4295324
I'd start with a mentally forced mashup for each to get a few that might work. e.g. "If i've got to make money by lead generation with a medical bill review service/app, how could i do it?"
Then i'd focus on how we'd drive value to the consumers.
Then think about driving value to others parties who may be willing to pay for something similar.
ie would pharmaceutical and medical device companies be willing to communicate directly with these consumers?
note i'm not saying its easy by any means, but i do think its a real problem that could take off if an elegant and worthwhile solution came about.
So as i read it, the argument being made is: if Google had chosen the same path as apple did in their app store, Google would not have missed this opportunity.
t0:{[3,5],[0,0]},
t1:{[3,5],[0,5]},
t2:{[3,5],[3,2]},
t3:{[3,5],[0,2]},
t4:{[3,5],[2,0]},
t5:{[3,5],[2,5]},
t6:{[3,5],[3,4]},
}
Thinking about making this an algorithm, are we forced to use recursion?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interchange_fee
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interchange_fee#/media/File:Ga...
http://www.businessinsider.com/list-credit-card-processing-c...
edit: nvm you linked it second. that seems insanely risky to put it all in one address, right?
2) i absolutely agree with the insurance companies being on the hook. They alone will drive insurance rates that are through the roof if the company cant prove pen-testing, employee background checks etc... Unfortunately teh key to making insurance company care, is setting a high standard for breach victim payouts. ie if it only ends up costing an average of $0.10 per individual victim, i dont need to insure equifax for that much?