No it doesn't. You're a liar and a fabulist, and your pseudo-scientific blog postings don't deserve recognition. Stop spamming crappy blogs on a technology site.
17 karma · joined January 24, 2013
Our legal system is biased toward those who can persuasively argue their case. If you can't do that, then you need to hire someone who can (e.g., a lawyer) instead of asking strangers on a public website.
1) Language X sucks. 2) Runtime Y sucks too.
Boo freaking hoo.
On paper, everybody's an expert when it comes to programming languages and runtimes, but funny how all the really popular and widespread options have well-known flaws. Why do you think that is, hmm?
Ask yourself which is more likely: that a major ISP is blocking traffic from the dominant operating system, or that you've configured something incorrectly?
FWIW, I don't think there's going to be too many disruptive structural changes, so there's no reason you can't start building based on 2.3. Depending on what features you do, updating might be as easy as doing a search&replace on certain class names.
I would find Patchy a compelling choice for Windows if it was a frontend to, say, libtranmission.
All three of these write to a single database file. This means that sharing the database would require having file available via a network share, _or_ keeping it in version control.