He streams regularly on twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/japaneseprintmaking
259 karma · joined May 10, 2014
He streams regularly on twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/japaneseprintmaking
Restoration itself does not grant a new copyright. Other elements included in a restoration may be copyrighted e.g. new music or the graphic design of intertitles. A new translation is also copyrightable; essentially it's only the "original elements" that enter the public domain. Working around the anti-piracy measures of a blu-ray might be a crime, idk, but that's irrelevant to the copyright discussion; once you have a copy even if it came from an 'illicit' source, you're free to copy & distribute as you wish.
But yes, you need to acquire a copy first; if you can't find a work at all, how would you copy it, practically?
import io.circe.syntax._
List(1, 2, 3).asJson
Where `asJson` requires an instance of an `Encoder`[1] and this Encoder can be derived with the help of implicits.For you as a normal user, the two common places where you might use implicits are (1) for implicit classes providing syntactic sugar:
// original
def doSomething(a: A): B = ???
val a: A = ???
val b = doSomething(a)
// with implicits
implicit class AImplicits(a: A) {
def doSomething: B = ???
}
val a: A = ???
val b = a.doSomething
and for (2) implicit conversions. These are a foot-gun, so should be used in limited circumstances. At work, we use case classes in data pipelines then convert these to avro classes on save; there's lots of ways to do this, but as an example if you have an `Optional[Int]` and your avro constructor requires a nullable java `Integer` then `JavaConverters` won't save you and you'll need something like: implicit def optIntToInteger(optI: Option[Int]): java.lang.Integer = optI.map(Int.box).orNull
[1] https://circe.github.io/circe/api/io/circe/syntax/package$$E...Also just an aside here to say that both the NY DOB and NY landlords are shockingly terrible in pretty much all possible ways.
This is mischaracterizing what is going on. There is rampant speculation by multinationals buying up old housing stock and attempting to do the New York City model of hyperluxury renovations at the expense of existing residents.
They're not death camps but they are literally concentration camps.
> The engineering team behind Gov. Cuomo’s miracle L-train cure has little experience working on transit projects — and spent a grand total of an hour evaluating the damage firsthand in the subway line’s tunnel
The new plan is to patch the tunnel rather than rebuild, which will clearly be a shorter-term solution for infrastructure that the DOT claimed was severely degraded.
Cuomo has controlled the MTA for EIGHT YEARS and except for the 2nd Ave subway has been useless in addressing its issues. He seems to be more interested in photo opportunities than actually fixing the budget, labor, infrastructure, and service issues that plague the subway.
"Cuomo’s tunnel experts spent just an hour evaluating damage" https://nypost.com/2019/01/04/cuomos-tunnel-experts-have-spe...
aka "we didn't do any research at all"
> we were inspired by Uber and Airbnb to just ignore the regulators.
Those pesky food safety regulations. These guys were extremely negligent and should be glad they got out before anybody got sick.
Our mayor has unfortunately listened to rich upper-west-siders who see e-bikes as a nuisance, so beginning in 2018 there will be increased enforcement against e-bikes. DeBlasio has suggested that e-bike users "use cars" instead. This is totally insane as it will only increase congestion and decrease safety overall.
Streetsblog NYC has good reporting on this: https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2017/11/22/delivery-workers-conf...
The key to surviving as a cyclist using bad cycle infrastructure is to be flexible and aware of the dangers around you. Crossing at a crosswalk is a reasonable response to drivers who don't check their mirrors and don't signal before turning. Running a red light when there is no cross traffic is a reasonable response to the fact that cars and bikes have different abilities to get up to speed from a stop and impatient drivers (especially, again, turning ones) are a huge risk to cyclists.
It's absolutely true that cyclists are often not strict rule-followers, but the rules are designed for cars which are large, fast, heavy, and can cause huge amounts of damage, while cycles are small, slow, light, and can cause at best small amounts of damage.
As a cyclist, I have to ride as if every single vehicle is actively trying to kill me.
none < sharrows (painted "share the road symbols") < in-street bike lane < bike lane along street w/ some buffer in between < bike lane along street with physical barrier < bike path separate from the street.
Unfortunately much of US cycle infrastructure is none/sharrows/in-street bike lane.
If you want a taste of the local discussion, just peruse the Streetsblog NYC bicycling category: http://nyc.streetsblog.org/category/bicycling/
I've lived in a few major American cities, where cycle infrastructure is poor and subservient to car traffic, and also in Sweden, Denmark, and Germany where cycling infrastructure is (mostly) reasonable and well-maintained. I've written on Metafilter before about the swedish infrastructure: http://www.metafilter.com/140136/Intersection-Protection#559...
It's pretty pathetic that the "greatest city" in the wealthiest country in the world can't provide better infrastructure.