beardyw

I was thinking more of climate change (in) denial.

"This article was originally published in The Washington Post"

Pretty much all you need to know in 2026.

AI just reflects humanity. There is no reason to expect it to be wiser

Yes, where are you going to take a bath, in public.

It's interesting that this subject is awash with euphemisms. At least pissoir is properly descriptive.

Is this also proposing the public execution of national leaders?

They found something in the way AI uses the model which could be compared to some basic brain functions.

It keeps the dollars coming in.

Yes, the difference between humans and LLMs is the small issue that LLMs have no idea what any of it means.

Use RSS. I have about 100 subscriptions: some dead, many very infrequent, the rest just right. A big advantage is you see a story only once.

For news I browse the BBC and the Guardian. They are too noisy for RSS, though I do take their science and technology feeds.

I am not a fan of AI but these kinds of articles are just so much nonsense. If the only kind of work you understand is knowledge work it feels like a challenge. But it ignores the fact that much of what humanity does is practical, that AI needs someone to keep the electricity on, and what on earth is the point of AI without humans to consume it's output?

Ok, thanks, no PhD!

I don't understand how the spin gets to be measured.

As soon as you say "Ay up" it should transfer to a real person. Seems like a win to me.

Sadly you are probably right.

Setting up your own aunt sally and then knocking down isn't that difficult.

Ha, but I did too since this is the 3rd posting of this story.

Given my latest post, no human may be involved in rejection either.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49360149

I wonder if Kurt Gödel read it?

Mobile operators sharing resources seems like only a good thing.

Not being in the US, what is the qualification for admissions supposed to be. Maybe I missed it. If it's not testing, what is it?

The full title "Scientists Identify 3-Minute Exercise That May Outperform 90-Minute Workout" has the "perhaps, maybe, who knows" found in the full article. Flim flam and flummery.

I think what's missing is the question "What is the point of it?". As humans we tend to assume that money has intrinsic value (it doesn't), that what we do is important (it isn't) etc. What will AI do that has any point other than to make human lives better?

Everything is subject to "quantum effects". Not necessarily trying to squeeze superposition and entanglement into a pint pot.

I think traditional banks are a safeguard against money laundering (as in WE did the right thing).

I thought competition was supposed to be a good thing.

That should read "popular beat combo".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_beat_combo

Or looking at it another way, if those who voted against him last time had voted at all, we would have Binface in parliament instead.

You have missed nothing.

This is like putting crocodile clips on a computer running AI to see how it works.

I think this is true for every country, perhaps including the USA.

Yes, the cheque's in the post.

Have you seen a doctor? No, just visions.