139 karma · joined August 25, 2012
[1] http://www.wbez.org/news/city-fires-investigator-who-found-c...
Public regulators are always preferable, when a market needs to be regulated as you admit, because the public, through the press and their elected representatives, can hold them accountable for their actions. If someone from the Mayo Clinic is receiving improper benefits from pharmaceutical companies how does the public find that out? There are no laws that would force disclosure of those relationships.
In the case of public regulators like the FDA, Congress can force its leaders to testify and the press has tools like FOIA to get at private documents. They're not perfect and can still lead to corruption and regulatory capture, but are preferable to private organizations with no public accountability regulating the pharmaceutical industry.
[1] http://www.indiana.edu/~jobtalk/HRMWebsite/hrm/articles/deve...
[1] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-origin_resource_sharing
[1] http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1118
[2] http://m.chicagoreader.com/chicago/chicago-marijuana-arrest-...
[1] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/https-everywhere/g...
[2] http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/8145/does-https-...
So you use Keep it ends up being good[2], but then 1 year from now Google announces it'll be shut down. Oh no! I guess I just have to download all my data from Keep and upload it to Evernote.
I understand people (although seemingly more people than actually used the product) are upset about Reader, and justifiably so, but I think it's a little hyperbolic to evaluate every new Google product in that light.
[1] https://www.google.com/takeout/
[2]I haven't used and don't really plan to, so I have no idea whether or not it's good.
We have to remember that Mozilla is a non-profit foundation with a specific manifesto[1] that espouses principles directly in opposition to the closed nature of Apple's App Store. Chrome on the App Store is a different beast than Firefox would be.
Google's primary mission, all the 'Don't be evil' stuff not withstanding, is to make money, so they need to go where users are. Mozilla's goal is to help build a free and open Internet to create choice for users, and a skinned UIWebKitView isn't real choice for users.
HN always seem quick to jump on the whole "Firefox is dying" meme, but Firefox still seems to to have about 20% market share in most usage reports I've seen[3][4]. I think it's great to see the Mozilla Foundation continue to standup for their principles.
[1] http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2335616
[2] http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/partners/
[3] http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/03/chrome...
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/01/examining-sonys-intern...