[flagged]
434 karma · joined July 22, 2008
That's from knowing nothing about the shape of consensus algorithms to almost getting one adopted.
To me Raft's brilliance is how easy, clear and comprehensible they made thinking about it.
SurvivorBias.png except it's a silhouette of a goose with numerous red arrows drawn over it.
I think having this flow out to all of the deps of libav is a greater good than notions of lib purity.
This is going to be great for real-time audio translation.
LLMs can be thought of metaphorically as a process of decompression, if you can give it a compressed form for your scenario 1 it'll go great - you're actually doing a lot of mental work to arrive at that 'compressed' request, checking technical feasibility, thinking about interactions, hinting at solutions.
If you feed it back it's own suggestion it's no so guaranteed to work.
I can only quote Joy Buolamwini on this:
“To fail on one in three, in a commercial system, on something that’s been reduced to a binary classification task, you have to ask, would that have been permitted if those failure rates were in a different subgroup?”
and Kangjie Lu's response: https://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~kjlu/papers/clarifications-hc....
In the United States, supercentenarian status is predicted by the absence of vital registration. The state-specific introduction of birth certificates is associated with a 69-82% fall in the number of supercentenarian records. In Italy, which has more uniform vital registration, remarkable longevity is instead predicted by low per capita incomes and a short life expectancy. Finally, the designated ‘blue zones’ of Sardinia, Okinawa, and Ikaria corresponded to regions with low incomes, low literacy, high crime rate and short life expectancy relative to their national average. As such, relative poverty and short lifespan constitute unexpected predictors of centenarian and supercentenarian status, and support a primary role of fraud and error in generating remarkable human age records.
Which is a shame as it may help them see that there is a way out of even the most all-encompassing scenarios of control.
Excellent point, one doesn't need an earphone that looks like traditional jewellery if the earphone is already fulfilling the purpose of traditional jewellery.
One might call this 'argument by gotcha' interesting to imagine the kind of lifeworld that makes one think this is a worthwhile form of persuasion.
Strikes me more like a manic episode than a useful text.
The point here is the previously assumed additional round of quantitative easing now going to be so hot on the heels of the last in January the US may as well be a command economy.