578 karma · joined June 12, 2011
Similar problem with Swift even though it started out as an open source project. The ties to Apple OSes are hard to break and ignore.
When it comes to owning a share, it eventually needs to make the investor money through dividends or price appreciation. The argument for high PE ratio is price appreciation (growth), but exponential growth is very hard to sustain, so PE ratio has to come down to a certain level in the long term. Also, there is always a risk of a company declining or even folding.
The Fed has a dual mandate for a reason which I believe is based on Phillips curve (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/phillipscurve.asp) that inflation and unemployment is inversely correlated. Now, it's fair to question this relationship...(I don't think it's as rock solid as it used to be), but the Fed's dual mandate is based on this theory. So, in some sense the goal of lower inflation implies higher unemployment.
Maybe possible if it's running as a truly decentralized algorithm running on blockchain with profits sustaining itself. (Not currently possible as far as I am aware.)
Users pay for ChatGPT -> OpenAI pays plugin developers for usage.
This incentivizes plugin developers to provide quality answers. Websites may still be required for full context or further interaction with the plugin developer.
Is there any other than China?
You can do it with a free Apple Developer account. You only need to pay $99 if you want to distribute it through the App Store.
Just a different explanation for this: If one has a super pessimistic view of effects of global warming in the next 50~100 years, e.g., collapse of civilization, it's reasonable not to have kids to prevent their suffering.
It seems that the question is if there is a version of Facebook that does not lead to misinformation and other harms, or at least outweighed by benefits of having a communication channel like Facebook.
I assume a lot of valuable data originate from customer-facing applications, so the team that already has a customer-facing product now has to manage a new internal-facing data product.
My worry is that the data product won't get the love it deserves.
It seems that centralization is the natural outcome of decentralization. We live in the tension in between the two extremes.
I can see this carving out a space for low value tasks.