balefulboy

>No one should be planning on being a software engineer in about 3-5 years, all need to plan for alternative income sources or early retirement. I think, at least.

Interesting. I recall Geoffrey Hinton saying something similar about Radiologists.

“People should stop training radiologists now” "it is just completely obvious that within 5 years deep learning will do better than radiologists”

https://youtu.be/2HMPRXstSvQ?si=prlQ_uGkCrWAZwgU&t=22

Well it's not exactly saturated when OAI refused to use the harness explicitly provided by ARC-AGI. I'm not really familiar enough with the benchmark to declare whether it's a perfect measure for AGI, but I kind of doubt it is.

Because they saw how much hype Glasswing was getting in April

I'm always tired of seeing at the top of every new model release post on here. I say Simon should just keep it to Twitter.

Don't forget the 3D demos. My favorite is in the house tour where the sink and stovetop(?) are obviously very misaligned from the counters

72 to 74 on DeepSWE is AGI

it seems the older models were capped at 10kusd for the runs though?

Damn, that beam of light was a flashbang. I wouldn't call this tasteful UI design, but maybe I just need to go to sleep.

Greentext is eh. Very formulaic, in fact very similar to the bottomless pit one, which I'd argue is better because of it's absurdity. I have to ask, did you mention the older GPT version to fable in the prompt?

i got a 502

METR's time horizon is not a reliable metric of LLM capability growth: https://www.transformernews.ai/p/against-the-metr-graph-codi...

yeah man this sucks. i genuinely do not know how people find this stuff appealing

I still don't know why people are saying this. I don't really code but from what I've heard on here the models haven't improved since Opus 4.5