According to both the FDA News Release and the letter, it's under emergency use authorization for all ages, not only for 12-year olds and for booster shots.
-6 karma · joined August 7, 2021
http://www.padrak.com/coronavirus/Dr.%20Sean%20Brooks%20at%2...
From FDA's letter (instead of the link):
"I am authorizing the emergency use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19, as described in the Scope of Authorization section of this letter (Section II) and subject to the terms of this authorization. Additionally, as specified in subsection III.BB, I am authorizing use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine and of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA when used to provide: a two-dose regimen for individuals aged 12 through 15 years; a third dose to individuals 12 years of age or older who have undergone solid organ transplantation or who are diagnosed with conditions that are considered to have an equivalent level of immunocompromise; or a single booster dose at least 6 months after completing the primary series to individuals: 65 years of age and older; 18 through 64 years of age at high risk of severe COVID-19; and 18 through 64 years of age whose frequent institutional or occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 puts them at high risk of serious complications of COVID-19 including severe COVID-19."
If I'm interpreting this right:
- the existing vaccine is still available under emergency use authorization.
- a different vaccine called COMIRNATY was approved.
I didn't understand from FDA's letter if COMIRNATY exists.
The inventor of mRNA vaccines, Dr. Robert Malone, claims FDA approved a vaccine that doesn't exist. https://www.bitchute.com/video/DZQFYRGDkB6s/
FDA's announcement https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download
Point to the sentence that says the vaccine got approved.
What do you lose in this trade off?
I don't understand what you're saying.