Hacker News Reader

axqpzzvon I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073269/

"There is a significant inverse association between treatment with pubertal suppression during adolescence and lifetime suicidal ideation among transgender adults who ever wanted this treatment. These results align with past literature, suggesting that pubertal suppression for transgender adolescents who want this treatment is associated with favorable mental health outcomes."

axqpzzvon I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it

Puberty blockers and hormones are different things, that's why they have different names. Puberty blockers do not cause infertility or a lack of sexual function. So 96% of children go on to become adults that choose to take hormones because they made the right decision going on puberty blockers. There is a good reason why children should have access to puberty blockers, and to not suffer through a puberty that isn't in line with their gender; it's so they don't kill themselves.

axqpzzvon I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it

You are wrong. Puberty blockers do not cause infertility or lack of sexual function. Your statements are incorrect and incongruent with established medical knowledge and advice. Also, trans is an adjective, not a plural noun.

axqpzzvon I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it

What sort of things do you fear being bullied for saying? I can honestly say I'm not afraid of being "cancelled" for going against some sort of group think. So I'm curious what kinds of things that people that hold your opinion are afraid of being punished for saying, could you give some examples?

axqpzzvon France starts a debate on legalising assisted dying

Again, you're really using the idea of the 'natural' course of events that just suits your argument. Unless you believe in destiny, predetermination, etc., there is no path along which either of those things will continue without requiring additional force to reach it.

For a person to continue living or a pregnancy to continue, they must continually exert, collect, and consume energy in the form of food and water. Why isn't that additional force? The 'natural' course of events, without any outside 'force', is for everyone and every living thing to drop dead in a couple of days tops.

"Okay, but obviously living beings were designed to continue living, seeking energy to continue sustaining their existence is obviously a natural course of events" you might say, but why does it have to end there? Why isn't the very natural path that all humans begin on, one of being a social creature that desires to assist others in their tribe, the 'default' force as well?

It really seems like there can't be any clear cut answer, and it's just philosophical sleight of hand. You also haven't addressed the point that if one person wants to help the other, preventing that is clearly a form of force.

axqpzzvon France starts a debate on legalising assisted dying

You're right that that is assistance, but how is literally forcing someone/some corporation from assisting someone not forcing the end result of them remaining pregnant? The idea of the 'natural course of events' is doing a metric ton of heavy lifting here for your argument, where does something begin or end being the 'natural' course of events? You can argue that 'natural' includes all the biological processes of living/dying, becoming pregnant/giving birth, but why doesn't it include the other biological processes of other human beings deciding to exert effort to provide assistance that are opposing the other biological process?

axqpzzvon France starts a debate on legalising assisted dying

That's fine if you're talking about the right for individual doctors to not help someone with something, but if the default course of events would have been "someone helping someone do something", banning that help is, in your own words, forcing them. While I personally think suicide is a terrible answer for almost literally anything, I respect others don't feel the same way and might seek assisted suicide.

In fact it sounds like, and forgive me if I assume incorrectly, your argument is meant to be opposed to assisted suicide, but I would use the exact same argument in favor of it, all forms of recreational drugs, (ethically produced) porn, and other such things that harm no one except potentially the person making the decision. Obviously there's a lot of grey area there but we don't need to get super pedantic.

axqpzzvon We’ve updated our policy to prohibit sharing someone else’s live location

Why do people who disagree with you have to be 'indoctrinated', 'clouded', or ruled by some 'narrative'? Maybe other people can just look at what Elon does and says, and come to the personal opinion that he's an asshole. It's not something that can ever be objectively true or false anyway, don't act like we're out here denying some set of facts or evidence to fit with our beliefs. I'm literally watching him do and say things, that in my personal opinion, firmly set him in the 'asshole' camp.