awestroke

And HomeKit is a product for IOT. Not 100% logical naming

> However, Apple’s documentation lacks crucial information on how to use these new APIs (FB10140097), and there were no WWDC sessions or sample code available in the weeks following the keynote. > Thanks to some trial and error, and some help from other developers, I was able to put together this sample code, demonstrating how one can use ExtensionFoundation/ExtensionKit to define custom extension points for their Mac apps.

Christ

I think this is by design. Apple wants to weed out non-loyal developers, so only the ones who truly love the platform build software for it. Unfortunately, it drives developers to use cross platform tech instead, which apple hates

They really love the Kit suffix, eh?

Can't he be arrogant and exceptional at the same time?

That's no easy feat

Hotz has always come across as very arrogant to me. Claims everyone else is doing things the wrong way, claims he can do it himself in 24h, then never delivers on his words.

I think that's a vocal minority. The majority doesn't care, and two equally small, vocal minority groups love and hate him, respectively

Fiber degradation is a problem after 30-40 years, not really something to take into consideration

You want them to provide a citation for their opinion?

Blame the employer, not remote.com. The employer decides what benefits they will pay remote.com to give to employees

This is hilarious to me.

I love reading about eve, but I can't imagine ever having enough free time for it

Signal does not have the keys either, so how could they accept moderators? Moderators of what, encrypted data streams?

> There’s simply not very much to do on the Quest Pro so far, and the HoloLens trajectory suggests that real apps will be slow to arrive.

Can't you play Quest 2 games on it?

Including coffee and tea?

Only if there is a flaw in the jpeg decoder

Very nice

What are the risks, exactly?

Let's add some IOT wifi-connected temperature sensors with RGB LED

I always choose rust, because the tooling and language feel thought through and it's easy to write once you learn it.

> There is nothing we're doing today that couldn't be done with Java for example.

Wow. Strongly disagree.

But it's being used by hardcore capitalists in this case? In fact, it seems to be in the republican handbook

Most people on coffee do not need it.

Refusing to interrupt is to stick to your ideals. Tit-for-tat does not work against interrupters, and especially against barkers

The worst part about flying is sitting in an uncomfortable, cramped space for hours

Sounds exhausting

See also:

sane - for node

watchexec - rust based, static binary

They designed it from scratch: rounded corners, black bezels, glossy screen, side buttons. It's pure coincidence that it looks exactly like the previous design

So in the year 3000, a 20-year old has over 200 careers ahead of them?

And all of it has been destroyed bottom trawling