58 karma · joined December 3, 2010
I am wondering if a product can have an 100% performance increase, then it must be pretty badly built the first time around. isnt it? I like openoffice, and didnt really think it needed a 100% performance upgrade, but hey more is better.
let me know if you develop on this.
https://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=delete_a...
I did this just a month ago.
I think of interest to web startups would be the aspect of which browser is being used by those people who are willing to buy products based on the internet and those do not tend to be people who use IE. I am excluding buying things like ebay, amazon etc.
If you consider buying internet based things, like basecamp for e.g., you could see that this population would mostly use chrome, firefox or safari. This is purely my intuition, mainly because if people care about using an internet based product, they would want the product looks good, works well and is fast on their browsers and they will thus be using one of the better browsers.
For companies with most of their clients using their own personal computers (like for us), we could expect a fair share of Chrome over IE and hence the following: 1) Our QA should have a major focus on testing with these browsers. 2) Architecture needs to focus on this stat. as a guiding principle while deciding future architecture.
Another interesting statistics is the second screenshot with the Mobile Operating systems. 1) The highest share of internet browsers still run a Nokia Symbian phone. Most likely these are traffic from developing countries, where monetizing from these clients is extremely difficult. 2) iPhone and Android are tied and very close.
So focusing only on iPhone could be a mistake. We need to open up to focusing on Android just as much.
And of course , big thanks for docbook!
I do not think a one-size-fits-all search engine would be the answer here. :)
are you a part of Anonymous? :))
--------
I subscribed to filesonic when sharing of links were allowed. I am no longer interested to have this account if there is no sharing of links allowed. The functionality of the service that I signed up for has signifcantly reduced. Thus I would like a refund of my subscription fees. Since my membership was for Lifetime $149. I would like a full refund of this amount please.
---------------------
Conspiracy to commit racketeering - 1962 Conspiracy to commit copyright infringement Conspiracy to commit money laundering - 1956 Criminal copyright infringement
Of these the level of charging these that are defined in 1962 and 1956, at this point the level of racketeering charge or the intensity of money laundering charges must definitely different from that of the situation now. This does not seem like a just system.
I personally shifted to Gandi.net, simply for the want of moving to a Europe based provider. I think US based providers are eventually going to be forced in if the Act goes through anyway.
The advantage here is they will be able to sell napkins to a community at a MUCH lower price and still make a profit using these small machines than the industrial ones.