(The next line after the story's end.)
28 karma · joined May 7, 2015
(The next line after the story's end.)
As a kid, it was great fun to watch, but I wouldn't put up with it these days. If I have to fight traffic and go to a shop, I like to get in and get out as fast as possible.
Best was best (ahem) known for its funky stores' architecture. The one in Sacramento, California, was especially interesting[1]. A corner of the building was literally removed to open the showroom then put back at night to close up shop.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_Products [1] http://www.emporis.com/buildings/1260719/best-products-showr...
It seems Khosla and his legal team plucked $30M from where the sun don't shine. I hope the state does use eminent domain to restore the public's access to one of California's most beautiful beaches.
Some background: http://www.hmbreview.com/news/martin-s-beach-now-open-for-a-...
The insertion of %HESITATION to denote pauses of speech is an unexpected delight.
A long time ago, as work-study, I transcribed several audio recordings of descendants of the first non-Native settlers of Santa Clara Valley. There were many ellipses in my transcriptions, and I wonder if future researchers will question if they represent hesitation, ums or uhs, or periods where the recording was unintelligible.
I will never forgive Creative for buying then decimating Henry Kloss' Cambridge SoundWorks. I so wanted a Model 12.
I spent a year at the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The number of statutes and regulations for just CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) [1] for example fills 425 pages. The department also oversees building codes, liquid pipeline infrastructure, wildlands defense, fire & rescue, etc.
Whenever a new or amended statute is introduced it takes months to evaluate if it replaces or conflicts with existing code. If passed and signed into law it can take a year or more to integrate.
Every year a newly-elected legislator introduces a bill akin to simplifying existing laws. Every year these bills never make it out of committee (i.e., they are shelved) because it would require years of pulling committed resources (SMEs, analysts, support personnel and millions of dollars) out of threadbare operations.
Every department in the State draws up a similar analysis, and the cumulative cost scares the legislature/governor. But it's a good way to introduce the green legislator into how the state government works.
The joke in the halls of the Natural Resources building is that there are too many rules and regulations, but there are not enough resources to correct the situation.
F&FP had no central repository of its own codes. Analysts had to use keyword searches of the public California Codes website!
[1] http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/2014_CEQA_Statutes_and_Gui...
Those six—now seven updated—rules are on a higher intellectual plane than that of the average netizen.
I'd use a metaphor to summarize my observation, but I don't want to break the rules.