ausudhz

That's why we need new licensing. Because the OSS is open doesn't mean they can use data without the owner's permission.

Of course today we don't have license that covers for it, but I'm pretty sure it'll come along sooner or later this is a huge problem

No, grandma won't be compensated because she's not the data owner and she doesn't have a copyright on her recipe.

Who get compensated currently are all the recipe websites that have the grandma recipe on it and gain money from ads (likewise when the recipe is in a book grandma won't get any money either)

AI comes and does not output a new version of the recipe, you ask ChatGPT to get you a recipe for a specific type of pasta and it will write it down, without visiting any of the 100 and more website that have these information (thus don't get money generated from the missing traffic)

Then the question on derived data (e.g. a net new recipe) is different and probably is hard to draw a line, but it's still thanks to the original data that the model has been able to get that new recipe.

I don't know how they should be compensated, but I'm pretty sure that data owner should be compensated. Either upfront (e.g. pay X to get our data) or on usage (e.g. every time the model infer information from a specific owner then it must reward - revenue sharing).

Of course the first approach is easier while the second is more convoluted

Yes it will if the access to their website drops (and it will if people get information from a chat rather than visiting a website)

That's a good take, but the point I think is on revenue sharing.

You can use data, just reward the data owners a fair percentage based on the incoming revenue of the Company (big or small)

If with these 20$ I can blame the machine for any bug maybe I can think about it

Conflict of interest

Depends, only the one that do the 10 minutes YouTube video and/or 500 words article to make money from ads.

If you dig well, there are people who do really good content out there

Depends on the human

> it doesn’t matter if content was written by a human or by a machine

It matters a lot instead. On the top of my mind I can think about few reasons:

- if you've to train a NLP model you'd rather do with data that is not autogenerated as AI generated content is rarely used to train new models (like generating a bounce of dogs pic with dall-e and use as input for image detection may not create a precise model)

- if you pay content creators to generate content and they use ChatGPT that's definitely a breach on contract and also a problem

- many search engines (e.g. Google) already heavily penalize auto generated content

- avoid cheating at exams / officials test/certs

It would still need human to develop enough data to have an AI to come with something meaningful.

If were to ask an AI model how to structure a good e-commerce when no previous data on e-commerce was available probably you'd get nothing meaningful.

Or ask how to do a human centric design when the web was all about animated gifs and flashy buttons. Probably you'd never get minimalist design as an answer.

You ever been to an hotel before?

I also prefer to have people reading my mind but communication helps. Plus most of the time switching a button to "no disturb" would do, I don't know what are you ranting about.

So what if the Airbnb does daily cleaning? You don't talk to the host to ask to remove the service?

> In my opinion, this should be opt-in, rather than opt-out.

I'm pretty sure most people prefer to come back with a room cleaned up, if you really don't like it just communicate it, write in the form when you book or whatever is not that hard.

put "no disturb" in your hotel room and confirm it to the reception. They'd not enter

How can you compare two things when one of them is not available?

It's implied that both Airbnb and hotel must be available to make a comparison. When that's the case most of the time hotels are better.

That being said, if there are no hotels available of course any other alternative would be better.

If you've a large family with multiple children yes, Airbnb may be better

There are hotels that do have it. They're called residence

> Maybe I'm just to old to deal with that crap.

Same I don't want to think if my flight delays for a few hours whether the host can give me the key, where we should meet etc. I just want to get in the room as soon as possible knowing that if I'm in a new place I can always count on the hotel staff for any help.

Definitely hotels win on many levels compared to private hosts

None of the hotels I went to ever charged me more than once.

I've been in many both for work and for pleasure in 4 continents

Use hotels. Airbnb has been comparable to hotels in the area, without extra services, no loyalty points, no daily cleaning (in many cases) and no added value at all.

At least before you'd pay significantly less than an hotel. Now hotels are more convenient especially if you're member and you get it with a discount

Chinese reminder theorem is from 300 CE. 1700 years ago.

That's actively used in some libraries to validate the key (as stated in the link)

Euler just proved what Fermat theorized.

Is not complex at all, if you can't multiply two prime number and do subtraction probably you should reconsider your skills.

If people were able to do that in 15th century by hand I don't see how who really needs it couldn't.

Is just the needs were different, but is not complicated

I did that in university before you born

It can be done manually easily

That's the point. Still though is very old is not a 19th century problem. Yet RSA was used 400 years after the theory behind

Why didn't people came up with a manual "RSA" before. Since the math is 400 years old.

You took the wrong one

What are you talking about. That was the first cipher.

RSA is OTP?

For centuries people have been encrypting things "by hand" and "inconveniently" (Cesar's cipher is an example, I can make many more).

RSA doesn't largely depends on the existence of computer, it could've been used "by hand" using the math behind it. The reason why was not is because, prior to computer, there was not a problem of "sharing" the key (and btw Nazi knew that a single key was weak, that's why they'd change it everyday to encrypt the communication with enigma)

> I would say it's more interesting that one-time pad encryption was not invented and used much earlier than 19th century

That's not true, as I mentioned Cesar's cipher is an example of that, though of course uses a simple key. Radio communications (and of course internet later) is the reason why encryption started to boom on the early 19th century onwards.

Though there could've been different ways to ask rather than saying, arrogantly, "wheel is used everyday too"

> With this optimization, the values of n, e and d are not required, hence are ignored by typical implementations whenever p, q, dp, dq and qinv are available*

> *at least for OpenSSH, they do not have to be present: setting p=q=1 and dp=dq=qinv=0 makes the implementation use n and d.

https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/31807/why-does-my...

I think C is Turing complete for sure.

Great, you totally missed the point.

While the wheel has been used from the next day of its invention till today, the Fermat's little theorem had no application outside of pure math for roughly 400 years.

That's the difference between format and content. Web servers make sure the format is correct, they won't inspect the content