Every time he talks about valuing truth and free speech, he is lying.
7 karma · joined April 19, 2023
Every time he talks about valuing truth and free speech, he is lying.
Two very bad consequences for me if sideloading were easy:
1. There would be no safe product to recommend to my aging parents who would be vulnerable to social engineering.
2. A company with a popular produce like Facebook could go outside the store, which would normalize side-loading, thus rendering argument like ‘people who want safety can stick to the store’ moot.
The arguments about not wanting to control what other people do are moot. If you want a platform with side-loading, buy android.
They don’t build a world model at all. They make inferences from text.
Considering they have been trained on 100,000 books, and all of Wikipedia, they are remarkably unintelligent, and really only able to produce text that is consistent with what they have been trained on.
This is inaccurate. We can reduce the risk but not make it ‘minimal’. Also, we can’t always provide ways to constructively handle negative effects.
If we can reduce the level of trauma and fear in society, we can reduce associated behaviors.
Ludicrous false equivalency.
The USA doesn’t have laws preventing its citizens from criticizing the government, nor are its corporations required by law to participate in policing speech.
This is the reason why criticism of China is so muted.
Yes, taking guns away would reduce shootings, but so would helping people who are so fearful they feel the need to shoot someone who isn’t threatening them.