280 karma · joined January 16, 2022
Like, I wouldn't say the Zimbabwe dollar is inflating, its instead inflated
Cloud gaming changes this imo, while both cloud providers in australia are more expensive than even psdeluxe, xbox cloud's deals made me switch away from ps focus to PC/xbox focus, even on my super old laptop
And that hitting something with a sledge or smashing a window would both activate alarms, and just, be really loud regardless.
Yes, there is places without windows and with reinforced doors
Even setting that aside, impressioning attacks require only seconds at a doorway for each step in the process, this defeats that attack.
bump keys only requires ~30 seconds if you are lucky, this defeats that
And yes DoD has security cameras, most places do actually.
The prices are vastly different, but the 250 is for a pre-production demo model, I'd expect the price to be halved or more upon production
e.g. a key with mechanical sections to actuate the pins to specific heights, plus, a very precise rotational sensor (perhaps acoustic sensors too)
but anyways, potential but easily fixable methods: a magnet with enough force to pull the slider would give tension, so just don't make it ferrous
the slider will always get super close to the front of the lock body, could be drilled, even if a stronger steel or the such, and then tension from there. Fixed by not surrounding the last pin with the slider, only needs ~1/4th of the last pin's space at most.
Its a nice solution, very compact overall
Loading the entire wasm, touching all the things that need to be touched, etc, takes up the majority of the time
15 requests. 21.65 MB / 7.66 MB transferred. Finish: 8.19 s. DOMContentLoaded: 707 ms. load: 2.95 s.
no, stop. I'm super confused about the obsession of clonking specifically the reference implementation when other implementations exist, like micropython for example. Sure, less compatible, but you are already not getting native modules so shrug?
RPi4 should support power and network through its usbc plug, however you'll still need another cable for video currently.
the frame.work "SBC" would allow all 3 through the same connector, but, you'll be looking at ~400+ per SBC just to achieve this, but the key thing is, its 100% doable if you get the hardware combination right
(0.9005 × .1) × (1-.995) + (0.9005 × .9)
Except when it isn't, which is kinda the point: Its a fan and a filter, if the fan is improperly fitted, path of least resistance starts playing, if the filter is improperly fitted, blah blah
making a fan spin to the point of getting the most volume allowed through a filter, is probably the easiest bit of the entire process
- - -
"how cringe is that." / "Yeah and cola with Kiwi is also a nice cocktail recipe. Cringe man,"
"Every kid calls himself a Researcher these days because he opens Google."
Glass houses and stones
Why is the conclusion that the hardware is bad, not that the method of using the hardware is bad?
so when not used, it uses less than other systems when not used, but when used it uses up to the same amount of energy?
unless its a million times less, when you use resolve-it-later-bitcoin
I'm assuming they are going to be saying "if you do a million tx on lightening before closing the channel, it'll be only 1 transaction" or something?
- - -
edit: it started going on about newton's laws, the equal and opposite reaction I had was to stop reading
for example, Sublime never did that, sublime was closed, and is closed, and will be closed.
They arn't trying to gain traction at the cost of lying in their advertising and labeling, they don't exclusively release closed licensed versions of their "open-source" product like MS does
biggest hugest problem though: no one cares, go ask your mom about the difference between web1, 2, and 3
/^ (\d+) ** 4 % \. <?{ $/[0].all <= 255 }> $/
/^ (\d+) \. (\d+) \. (\d+) \. (\d+) <?{ $/.all <= 255 }> $/ raku: ^ ( \d+ <?{ $/ <= 255 }> ) ** 4 % '.' $
slow raku: ^ ( @(0..255) ) ** 4 % '.' $
rulex: <% ( :( range '0'-'255' ) '.' ){3} :( range '0'-'255' ) %>
regex: ^(?:(0|1[0-9]{0,2}|2(?:[0-4][0-9]?|5[0-5]?|[6-9])?|[3-9][0-9]?)\.)((0|1[0-9]{0,2}|2(?:[0-4][0-9]?|5[0-5]?|[6-9])?|[3-9][0-9]?))$
- making plans without executing them, using forks as upvote button
- when you make or fork a repo, it shows to ur followers, hence same people each time
and yeah, they do things to make number go up, consider it "metagaming" as opposed to like, bad stuff. Anyone is allowed to play github how they want!
as always, check their original code, la commits done by their accnt, ignoring anything silly (small, low effort commits) as punishing someone for being silly, is a bit silly, look at their PRs, look at their projects they have efforted on, etc, if there are none, then just treat it like they had no github.
Its a cyberdeck, the more questionable the features the better, because then you can make up silly scenarios about saving the world with it, e.g. doing a direct audit of the network hardware in a datacenter, plug in your serial cable, download the running/stored configs, beam them up to some wifi accessable server, plus generate a paper backup at the same time
or, log into your deck at the start of the day, as you are reading the morning news, you get a printout of today's todo list and agenda
etc, its a lifestyle meme, not a computer
You don't consider this a truth, I do. By google's standards it is a truth, https://cloud.google.com/web-risk/docs/caching for one example
> I get that you feel like you could design a better Go module proxy.
I add "sleep 1" at minimum to all my scraping loops, and refuse to use clients that don't keepalive and cache (if I'm hitting the same endpoint), I've done this always, so yes I could have designed a better proxy today, and a year ago, and two years ago, and three years ago, et, al.
> Money generating
They can pay people, I'm not doing it for free for a language I don't use
> if he took the Go project's offer up on just not having them clone modules hosted on his service so often.
Do you know that he hasn't tried? considering how well google responds to emails
Some people have principles that you might not understand, I too would not ask someone to not DDoS me, because I feel that is an absurd request.
So not a impact to the technical aspects but to the administrative aspects. People are paying devault to run a service as devault would, it would be improper for him to not run the service as expected of him.
> burn the extra bandwidth for a cacheing benefit that literally nobody on the Internet seems to be able to describe
bandwidth and CPU time both cost money
- - -
There are alternative approaches that have existed before 1.16, Deno with its pull once then pull only when told to approach, has not had a crisis of security, Every other language works on demand, NPM at most checks a dedicated security issues API designed for mass consumption. These things existed, none of them were referenced.
Its akin to putting up an open exploitable DNS resolver in 2022 despite, with 2 seconds of research, the entire world telling you not to do that
no one needs to full clone 2 times a minute just to check if a security update exists
one of the top money generating machines does not need a devil's advocate
reminds me of git/hub changing from master to main, and how that did nothing to help minorities get hired, did nothing to fight for better wages, better treatment, for those that have been hired, etc
Or perhaps worse, since the people involved in the change felt like something was achieved, they may feel that their part is done and no longer seek out other changes, which could actually have helped people instead
- - -
https://www.tinderpressroom.com/taking-care-of-everyone-in-o... anyways 2019 should be added to title, url replace with this