748 karma · joined November 27, 2010
We sell these modules, but we also release them with a MIT license & include the schematics, PCBs, code & even how & where to source parts.
We hope to bring modular for every musician & bring the cost less than buying software plugins.
Seems like the author has never build an app before. There nothing easy even with the current tech. It's much harder with the tech they mentioned.
Even with that, there's a centralized system anywhere. Liek Arweave's DNS system etc.
And most of us doesn't use fast SSDs like in PS5 and it works really well. Also these engineers said, it even works just fine with slowers HDDs too. Because, they don't stream meshes for each camera movements. But it's a continuos setup.
This is thanks to Next.js Static Regeneration features.
Basically stale-while-revalidate header support.
Always saying resource not available. My account is a pretty new account.
In contrast, one of my friend is having a pretty old account which is very active. He has no such issue.
So I think due to this issue, Google has enabled some resource limitation for new accounts.
But they should properly communicate this issue.
So, you don't scale up and down as you deploy. Once you call the `now alias` it'll take care of the scaling.
We use existing technologies. Anyone can use any cloud Database service. We've datacenters on San Fransisco and in Belgium. So, based on those users can choose where they need to deploy their DBs.
Usually we recommend to configure databases via env variables. Users can also use our [now secrets](https://zeit.co/docs/getting-started/secrets) service as well to avoid hard-coding secrets.
Yes. We build the container based on the Dockerfile.
For an simple web app, you might not need special CPU and Memory requirements. But for a video encoding/decoding serverless app may needs different CPU/Memory requirements (and GPU).
That's what this `slot` configuration property does.
The default is good enough for all the general purpose apps. But if you need more, you can control it.
No. You don't need to pay to store containers.
> 2. How is a Dockerfile versioned? Can I update it? Or do I need to redeploy
Once the Dockerfile is built, you'll get a URL for that. It's a immutable URL and you don't need to re-deploy again. It'll sleep if there are no HTTP requests. If there are it'll start again.
> 3. Is pricing for containers granular by time or per request to a container?
It's based on the container running time. But we'll have a another blog post on this soon with more info.
> 4. How can these Dockerfiles talk to each other? Is there an API or method to fetch specific url's for each container?
There's no internal API to communicate with each other. But every docker container has a URL. You can use our [alias](https://zeit.co/docs/features/aliases) feature and communicate with each other via HTTP.
So, I am thinking this post deserves a better title.
We just wanted to make "now" the go to tool for cloud deployments.
We've a backend for "now" and that's the pricing we've mentioned on our page. Just like that, we've providers for AWS, Google Cloud, Azure and etc.
We'll sure make "ZEIT now cloud backend" better everyday. But sometimes, we just wanna deploy to existing clouds. That's what this is about.
If you decide to deploy to AWS, you don't need to pay nothing for ZEIT.
You can also think like, this is we challenging ourself :)
Basically it makes building client side apps faster and fun. Check this for more info: https://learnnextjs.com/
But Next.js is not like this. It's only for the UI (rendering) You can build server rendered React apps pretty easily. It supports dynamic imports, prefetching, preloading and you name it.
Now you can export any Next.js app into a static app too.
Recently, Meteor adds some new JS features into it's build setup too.
And we are pretty closely work with JS stuff. But Next.js is inspired by the simplicity of PHP.
### Anti SPA
The whole idea of Next.js is to build a SPA easily. But it's also server rendered by default.
I used it for highlighting points. I think I am over using it. Will minimize it.
I'd like to get you feedback on what we can improve. Could you post your feedback here - https://github.com/kadirahq/react-storybook/issues
This is a way to list components and show their different use case. We can also develop individual components by just looking at this.
In the client side too, we had to work a bit more.
That's why we go with Lokka[0]. It's just a client for any GraphQL backend. It has a simple cache.
It also supports Relay like declarative data fetching. Basically, you could build a complete app with it using Meteor's other tools like FlowRouter.
As a downside, you may need to fetch more data from the server.
As a benefit, you don't need to learn much to build a app. May be can reduce the code compared with Relay. (But that's subjective)
Then you can optimize accordingly. We've some guides. Start here: https://bulletproofmeteor.com/basics/what-is-performance
GraphQL is different and trying focus on the API end. (You can think it's trying to replace REST). GraphQL's client side part it Relay for now. It's somewhat complex compared with Falcor. But, I believe we can have a easy to use React independent client for GraphQL.