aqme28

Interesting. Can you elaborate on why you feel strongly about this? It's easily removable--I don't think your characterization that it "forces" attribution is correct, it just defaults it.

> being in the middle of a public roadway in a registered vehicle shouldn't confer the expectation of privacy

And this is where US caselaw and my personal beliefs about privacy start to differ. Why can't we expect some level of privacy in a public place? There are some countries that confer that, to certain levels.

Though sometimes a prosecutors office will use a grand jury to fail to indict intentionally, like when the accused is a police officer they work with. It's a good way to launder away a prosecution that the DA doesn't want to pursue for political reasons.

OpenCode is also a pretty good harness.

How would Poker fit into that definition?

> It's still very odd that no species has ended up evolving a continuous maintenance system that can run while conscious, the benefits when hunting other animals that need sleep would be enormous, so there has to be significant evolutionary push for it.

I disagree. Endurance hunters walk an animal down throughout a single day. Sleep isn't the bottleneck. Efficient bipedalism and sweat are enough.

> you still would not structure your training as they did in that paper, because it makes zero sense.

That isn't relevant. The paper is not setting out to find the optimal way for people to train.

Do you have any evidence that this model is bench-maxxed? I know that's particularly difficult to quantify. If there is an indicator of bench-maxxing, that just becomes the new benchmark to benchmax.

Yes, this is a thing too. It's confusing for people who don't fly often for the obvious reasons, but experienced travelers have it just as bad because the rules vary wildly by airport and country.

I can't remember which airports/countries/systems require which procedures, so I just have to go in blind every time.

Also, two neighboring gates saying "Now boarding for Vienna" will confuse people too. You're a bit screwed either way.

I flew out of JFK a few days ago. Delta has about 50 check-in kiosk, and a few gate agents. With so many terminals, I was wondering why the area was so packed, with ten-minute lines to use an check-in kiosk.

I went to see a gate agent because I had a question. Right after yelling at someone else for the same reason, they told me "No, you have to use the kiosks."

By the time I got to the check-in kiosks I figured it out. Maybe they worked for some people but it had to be like 20% at best. Everyone else had to have help, myself included. It wouldn't scan my passport for the first 5 attempts, and then it wouldnt print my bag tag so I had to see the agent anyways.

What is the purpose of an automated system that drives everyone to the manual system? It just added an extra step.

Sorry for venting.

Having just "asked" my opencode instance-- Yes, but it's behind an experimental flag and not necessarily feature-complete.

ArtificialAnalysis puts out benchmarks for harnesses now as well, and OpenCode seems to be winning it. https://artificialanalysis.ai/agents/coding-agents#coding-ag...

I only found this yesterday, and it inspired me to start testing out OpenCode.

If it's purely about $$, what about the newer open models. DeepSeek and Kimi are roughly equivalent performance for a hell of a lot cheaper.

Wait, what are you disappointed by? Seems like a significant jump in performance, and it competes handily with other models.

If you're an engineer and your job is to defeat ublock origin, your work is not ethical. You're a facebook engineer-- you'll do just fine working elsewhere.

Yeah, exactly. I didn’t say anything to dispute that so I’m not sure what your point is. The time it spends as methane before turning back into CO2 is really bad

Not following your logic. A decade is a long time for such a powerful greenhouse gas.

In some places, like Germany, that reasonable expectation of privacy standard extends into public. You’re not allowed to just film strangers that have nothing to do with you. In some ways, I feel like this is a better system for our future.

Life in prison is a bit harsh but I otherwise agree.

I think the "American" version is the one that's outdated, if anything. The German one is a bit too restrictive, sure, but I'd rather lean a little towards too much privacy than too little.

I think it’s rational to say “I don’t want this bad thing that exists to be more ubiquitous.”

To be clear, I don’t think this reaction is irrational at all. I’m curious though why you do.

I was trying to brainstorm ways to make these palatable to general society. Because I think this kind of thing is going to happen, but a lot of people (myself included) have a legitimate problem with surreptitious recordings.

It needs a "recording" light when it is recording. But creeps will just disable the recording light with e.g. a sticker.

Idea: What if the recording light embeds a little IR signal, and if the camera recording doesn't pick up that signal, it stops working

Edit: I see they tried that already.

LLMs are becoming commoditized, which means the margins are trending to zero. It's a lot less exciting to spend another trillion on a new model if you can barely make any profit. Meta getting out of the game might be the smarter move.

Not sure what other way you’d even want. It’s super easy.

Just make a new slash command with those instructions as the prompt.

Yes, I meant given a similar cut ofc

If you cook enough you can tell by feel

I don’t know if I am convinced. Russia also uses a lot of Iranian drones, which presumably are going to have supply troubles because of this war.