The government could as well, of course, but I'm going by an Occam razor here.
54 karma · joined September 1, 2011
The government could as well, of course, but I'm going by an Occam razor here.
Also, threading algorithm changed slightly in Mavericks, leading to many more mistakes than ever before.
IP law, as currently used, is something really overcomplicated.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Color_Terms:_Their_Univer...
On the other hand, if you're a scout for an armed band of hunters, 5 are no longer “a lot”, it is “some” - and 50 is a lot.
After all, it were Sumerian traders and bureaucrats who gave us both figures -and- numbers -and- a way to write them down.
Your skin is brown? DROP A BOMB. You're a Muslim? DROP A BOMB, AND ONE MORE, TO BE SURE. You're a goddamn Ruski commie? BOMB, BOMB, BOMB.
Seriously though, an idea of a fake meat modified to taste like human meat is both troubling and intriguing.
Initially, it probably will be quite expensive, but it is most certainly _potentially_ cheaper than real meat due to tech advances and economies of scale.
As for farm animals, they will be just bred less. Nobody will mass slaughter them just because there is a cheaper source of meat.
Powerful typing system, like the one Scala or Haskell have, is brutal as much as it is magical.
The thing is, that for a young, smart person, mechanically giving up 50, 60, heck, 100 hours per week is not that hard, but it gives the nice “hero” feeling, social kudos.
Empirically, in full-time scenario (30+ hours per week), there is no difference in velocity of development work with more time spent; yet, there are toxic social effects.
Basically: what do the people who bash “undertimers” think?