.17% is not a huge number.
45 karma · joined July 15, 2015
.17% is not a huge number.
I haven't personally really noticed any downsides with that approach, can anyone else think of any?
URLs aren't secure, and shouldn't really be considered so.
I have no issue with javascript fading away over time, that's just not what's happening right now.
As far as I'm concerned we will still be adhering to all the core language constructs for the most adopted interpreter until a viable ancestor arrives.
Predictability is a huge part of conversing. I expect a lot of range and flexibility in conversations, but definitely not unpredictability. It seems like an ai (chatbot, rather) behaving unpredictably just covers for it's lack of abilities and tact.
Nonetheless, this is still a very cool project.
Also, the assumption that because two people have interacted means those relationship are easier to leverage isn't substantiated. I'm sure the result would be interesting, but it wouldn't necessarily be "more correct".
Would there be long term implications for the chip's longevity in the unit because it runs so hot?
There are more appropriate mediums to argue in if we feel Paul Allen isn't responding well enough to "the incident".